Solving IVP: Is My Answer Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter squenshl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ivp
squenshl
Messages
468
Reaction score
4
I had to solve an IVP:
\partial/u\partialt + 4\partialu/\partialx = e2x, u(x,0) = f(x).
I got an answer of u = 1/2 +f(x-4t).
Is this correct and if not, where did I go wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hard to tell where you went wrong without seeing your work. But it isn't correct for at least two reasons:

1. It doesn't satisfy u(x,0) = f(x) (although it would without the 1/2).
2. If you plug it into the DE you get 0, not e(2x).
 
Thread 'Direction Fields and Isoclines'
I sketched the isoclines for $$ m=-1,0,1,2 $$. Since both $$ \frac{dy}{dx} $$ and $$ D_{y} \frac{dy}{dx} $$ are continuous on the square region R defined by $$ -4\leq x \leq 4, -4 \leq y \leq 4 $$ the existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we pick a point in the interior that lies on an isocline there will be a unique differentiable function (solution) passing through that point. I understand that a solution exists but I unsure how to actually sketch it. For example, consider a...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top