Solving Laplace's Eqn: Setting Zero of Potential

  • Thread starter Thread starter bcjochim07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential Zero
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion addresses the solutions to Laplace's equation in the context of electrostatics, specifically regarding the potential outside an uncharged metal sphere and an infinitely long metal pipe in a uniform electric field. For both scenarios, the potential is expressed as V = -E0z + C, where C is determined by boundary conditions. The key concept clarified is the reasoning behind setting V=0 on the xy-plane, which is based on symmetry and convenience, as it does not affect the electric field derived from the potential.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Laplace's equation in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with electric fields and potentials
  • Knowledge of boundary conditions in potential problems
  • Concept of electric field as the gradient of potential
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of boundary conditions in electrostatic problems
  • Learn about the method of images for solving potential problems
  • Explore the concept of electric field lines and equipotential surfaces
  • Investigate the role of symmetry in electrostatic problems
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone studying electrostatics or working on problems related to electric fields and potentials.

bcjochim07
Messages
366
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have two quick related questions that I think will help clear something up for me.

(1) An uncharged metal sphere of radius R is placed in an otherwise uniform
electric field E = E0 zhat. The field induces charge. Find the potential in the region outside the sphere.

(2) Find the potential outside an infitely long metal pipe of radius R placed at right angle to an otherwise uniform electric field E0.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, so I am mostly comfortable with the solutions to these problems, with the exception of one key concept.

Problem 1: If E=E0 zhat (for r>>R, then V for r>>R is -E0z + C)
The one hang-up I have is that for problem (1), you set V=0 on the xy-plane "by symmetry." Thus we can say C=0. I'm not sure I understand the reasoning behind setting V=0 for all z=0.


Similarly, from problem (2), if we suppose that the electric field is pointing along z direction, so again, the form of the potential is -E0z + C. Again, one should set V=0 on the xy-plane, so C=0. I don't have a clear picture in my head of why you set V=0 on the xy-plane.


Any explanations of this concept would be greatly appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the electric field is the gradient of the potential, [tex]\vec{E} = - \nabla V[/tex] (for electrostatics), a constant shift in the potential [tex]V' = V + c[/tex] doesn't change the electric field. Therefore we are usually free to define the location of [tex]V=0[/tex] by adding a constant term to the potential. In your examples, choosing [tex]V(z=0) = 0[/tex] is just the most convenient choice, but it was not the only one.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K