Solving Law of Mass Action Problem with X', Y', and Z

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Carla1985
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Mass
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to the law of mass action, specifically focusing on the formulation of differential equations for two chemical reactions involving species X, Y, and Z. Participants are attempting to identify the reactions that correspond to the given equations and explore the relationships between the coefficients a, b, c, d, and e.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Carla proposes the first reaction as $X + Y \overset{a}{\rightarrow} Y$ with a negative coefficient, but struggles to identify the second reaction that fits the equations.
  • Another participant suggests that Carla's proposed second reaction $Y + Z \rightleftarrows Z$ could work for $Z'$, questioning why she thinks it doesn't.
  • A participant explains that for a reaction of the form $Y + aZ \rightarrow bZ$, the differential equation for $Z$ is proportional to $(b-a)YZ$, implying that if $a = b$, the change in concentration of $Z$ would be zero.
  • Carla expresses confusion about whether the reaction $Y + Z \leftrightarrows Z$ results in $Z'$ being zero, as there is a $Z$ on both sides of the reaction.
  • Another participant counters that the changes in $Z$ should be modeled as $Z' = dYZ + eZ$, suggesting that $Z$ decreases and increases due to the reactions on both sides.
  • One participant raises a concern about the conservation of mass, questioning how the concentration of Y can decrease while X disappears without a corresponding change in mass.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of the proposed reactions and the implications of the coefficients. There is no consensus on the correct formulation of the reactions or the relationships between the coefficients.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the relationships between the coefficients and the implications of the reactions on the concentrations of the species involved. The discussion highlights the complexity of modeling chemical reactions using the law of mass action.

Carla1985
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
I am working through some questions in a book and have got stuck on one. The question is:

"The equations below come from applying the law of mass action to two reactions.

$$X'=aXY \\
Y'=bYZ+cZ \\
Z'=dYZ+eZ$$

Find the two reactions and determine how the coefficients a,b,c,d and e are related, if at all. Assume a,b,c,d,e are nonzero but can be positive or negative."

I have got the first reaction as $X+Y\overset{a}\rightarrow Y$ with being negative. For the second reaction I initially tried $Y+Z\rightleftarrows Z$ which would work for $Y'$ but doesn't for $Z'$.

Could someone please point me in the direction of how I can work out what this second reaction needs to be.

Thanks
Carla
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Carla1985 said:
I am working through some questions in a book and have got stuck on one. The question is:

"The equations below come from applying the law of mass action to two reactions.

$$X'=aXY \\
Y'=bYZ+cZ \\
Z'=dYZ+eZ$$

Find the two reactions and determine how the coefficients a,b,c,d and e are related, if at all. Assume a,b,c,d,e are nonzero but can be positive or negative."

I have got the first reaction as $X+Y\overset{a}\rightarrow Y$ with being negative. For the second reaction I initially tried $Y+Z\rightleftarrows Z$ which would work for $Y'$ but doesn't for $Z'$.

Could someone please point me in the direction of how I can work out what this second reaction needs to be.

Thanks
Carla

Hey Carla! ;)

It seems to me that it works for Z' as well.
Why do you think that it doesn't? (Wondering)
 
I like Serena said:
Hey Carla! ;)

It seems to me that it works for Z' as well.
Why do you think that it doesn't? (Wondering)

My supervisor explained it to me that if I have a reaction, $Y+aZ\rightarrow bZ$ then the differential equation for $Z$ is proportional to $(b-a)YZ$, so if $a=b$ the difference is $0$ so the coefficient is $0$, i.e. there is no change in the concentration of $Z$.

That was my understanding. Have I misunderstood somewhere along the way?
 
Carla1985 said:
My supervisor explained it to me that if I have a reaction, $Y+aZ\rightarrow bZ$ then the differential equation for $Z$ is proportional to $(b-a)YZ$, so if $a=b$ the difference is $0$ so the coefficient is $0$, i.e. there is no change in the concentration of $Z$.

That was my understanding. Have I misunderstood somewhere along the way?

I see a couple of differences.
The reaction is in 2 directions instead of 1.
And it is not given that a=b, so we should assume they are different. (Thinking)
 
Sorry, I'm a little confused. If I have the reaction I originally thought $Y+Z\leftrightarrows Z$ isn't $Z'$ just $0$ as there is a $Z$ on either side of the reaction so the amount of $Z$ doesn't change with the reaction?
 
Carla1985 said:
Sorry, I'm a little confused. If I have the reaction I originally thought $Y+Z\leftrightarrows Z$ isn't $Z'$ just $0$ as there is a $Z$ on either side of the reaction so the amount of $Z$ doesn't change with the reaction?

We don't know.
We can only assume that Z decreases proportionally to YZ, and simultaneously increases due to the right hand side.
And then Z decreases proportionally to Z, and simultaneously increases due to the left hand side.
To model this, I think we should say that $Z'=dYZ+eZ$, which fits the equations.
 
Carla1985 said:
I have got the first reaction as $X+Y\overset{a}\rightarrow Y$ with being negative.

This is a bit odd actually.
We are assuming that the concentration of Y on the left side decreases with the same amount that it increases on the right side, so that effectively there is no change in Y.
But if that is the case, where did X go? (Wondering)
It seems to contradict conservation of mass.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K