Solving Lim x→∞ (x - ln x): Step by Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter r_swayze
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ln
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The limit of the expression lim x→∞ (x - ln x) approaches infinity, contrary to the initial assumption of negative infinity. The discussion emphasizes the application of L'Hôpital's Rule to resolve indeterminate forms, specifically when analyzing the expression ln(x)/x. Participants suggest rewriting the limit and utilizing derivatives to demonstrate that as x increases, the term x dominates ln x, leading to the conclusion that the limit diverges to infinity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Familiarity with L'Hôpital's Rule
  • Basic knowledge of logarithmic functions
  • Concept of indeterminate forms in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of L'Hôpital's Rule in different contexts
  • Learn about the behavior of logarithmic functions as x approaches infinity
  • Explore the Mean Value Theorem (MVT) and its implications in calculus
  • Investigate the properties of limits involving logarithmic and polynomial functions
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians analyzing limits, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of L'Hôpital's Rule and logarithmic behavior in limits.

r_swayze
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
Can somebody show a step by step process of how to get this answer?

I keep getting -∞ when it should be ∞

heres my work:

lim x→∞ (x - ln x) = lim x→∞ ((1 - 1/x ln x) / (1/x)

then apply l'hospitals rule

lim x→∞ (x^(-2) ln x - x^(-2)) / (-x^(-2))

then I cancel all the x^(-2) and I am left with -ln x which would equal to -∞
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can apply L'Hopital's rule only when you have an indeterminate form of [0/0] or [+/-infinity/infinity].

In this expression -- ((1 - 1/x ln x) / (1/x) -- 1/x approaches zero, but ln x approaches infinity, which makes it another indeterminate form.

I don't think that there's anything you can do with L'Hopital's rule on this one. You might try an approach that looks at the derivative of f(x) = x - ln x. It's easy to show that the derivative approaches 1 as x gets large, which suggests that x - ln x gets larger and larger.
 
Why don't you apply l'Hopital to the ln(x)/x part of your expression and use the result to simplify it?
 
(At the risk of confusing things) or take the first x into the ln(x).
 
Remember that ln(x) = \int_1^x \frac{1}{u} du and use the MVT
 
Dick said:
Why don't you apply l'Hopital to the ln(x)/x part of your expression and use the result to simplify it?

where does the ln(x)/x come from?
 
This is what I would do:

\stackrel{lim}{x\rightarrow\infty}(x-ln(x))\times\frac{(x+ln(x))}{(x+ln(x))}

This would give:\stackrel{lim}{x\rightarrow\infty}\frac{(x^{2}-ln^{2}(x))}{(x+ln(x))}

You could work it out from there, split the limit up by x^{2} and ln^{2}x

Hope this helped, and sorry about the poor formatting, this is probably the first time I am doing latex.

By the way, I'm sure the value is infinity.
 
You could do lim x→∞ (ln e^x - ln x) = lim x→∞ ln (e^x /x) and apply l'hopital's rule inside; the domain change of x to ln e^x is irrelevant because your limit exists within the domain of log.
 
zcd said:
You could do lim x→∞ (ln e^x - ln x) = lim x→∞ ln (e^x /x) and apply l'hopital's rule inside; the domain change of x to ln e^x is irrelevant because your limit exists within the domain of log.

I think I see it, but just to make sure, does ln e equal 1? so that can be plugged into any equation?
 
  • #10
Yes, ln e= 1.
 
  • #11
r_swayze said:
where does the ln(x)/x come from?

Write it (as you basically did) as x*(1-ln(x)/x).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K