Solving Limit Problems with L'Hopital's Rule

  • Thread starter Thread starter rdougie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    L'hopital's rule
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of L'Hopital's rule to the limit problem involving the expression lim_{x\rightarrow0} [ (x^{2}sin(1/x)) / sinx ]. Participants explore the conditions under which L'Hopital's rule is applicable and the behavior of the functions involved as x approaches 0.

Discussion Character

  • Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the limits of the numerator and denominator, questioning the applicability of L'Hopital's rule and the nature of the indeterminate form presented. There are attempts to rewrite the limit in different forms to analyze it further.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with various interpretations of the problem being explored. Some participants provide insights into why L'Hopital's rule may or may not apply, while others reflect on the oscillatory behavior of sin(1/x) and its implications for the limit.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the classification of the limit as an indeterminate form, with some participants asserting that it does not fit the criteria for L'Hopital's rule due to the nature of the functions involved. The oscillation of sin(1/x) near zero is also a point of contention.

rdougie
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



(a) Explain why L'Hopital's rule does not apply to the problem
lim[tex]_{x\rightarrow0}[/tex] [ (x[tex]^{2}[/tex]sin(1/x)) / sinx ]

(b) Find the limit.


Homework Equations



lim [tex]_{x\rightarrow0}[/tex] xsin(1/x) = 0 , by the Squeezing Theorem.

lim [tex]_{x\rightarrow0}[/tex] sin (1/x) Does Not Exist because it oscillates between -1 and 1.

lim [tex]_{x\rightarrow0}[/tex] x[tex]^{2}[/tex]sin(1/x) = 0 by the Squeezing Theorem.

lim[tex]_{x\rightarrow0}[/tex]sinx/x = 1



3. My attempt(s) at a solution

I wrote the original problem
lim[tex]_{x\rightarrow0}[/tex] [ (x[tex]^{2}[/tex]sin(1/x)) / sinx ]

as
lim[tex]_{x\rightarrow0}[/tex] sin (1/x) / lim[tex]_{x\rightarrow}[/tex](1/x) * lim[tex]_{x\rightarrow0}[/tex] (sinx/x).

Since the limit of the numerator doesn't exist, and lim[tex]_{x\rightarrow0}[/tex](1/x) is +[tex]\infty[/tex], and lim[tex]_{x\rightarrow0}[/tex] sinx/x = 1, then the limit of the problem doesn't exist, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try thinking of the original problem as

[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow 0} \frac{x\sin(x)}{\frac{\sin(x)}{x}}[/tex]
 
Where did sin(1/x) go?
 
Sorry

[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow 0} \frac{x\sin\left(\frac{1}{x}\right)}{\frac{\sin(x)}{x}}[/tex]
 
So now the limit is 0 if I use the Squeezing Theorem for the numerator, and the "lim sinx/x=0" for the denominator? Am I thinking about this correctly or am I just trying to plug and play?
 
the limit is zero for the numerator, but check the list you posted in the first post again, and see what the limit for [itex]\frac{\sin(x)}{x}[/itex] is.
 
ooh sorry lim sinx/x = 1.
ok thx!
 
So far you haven't said anything about
(a) Explain why L'Hopital's rule does not apply to the problem
limx->0 [ (xsin(1/x)) / sinx ]
 
rdougie said:
ooh sorry lim sinx/x = 1.
ok thx!

I think you usually use L'Hopital's rule to get that result in the first place though.

This seems like a poorly though out question to me, as any expression could be modified to make use of l'hospital's rule, by multiplying by [itex]\frac{x}{x}[/itex], or [itex]\frac{e^{-1/x}}{e^{-1/x}}[/itex] Then taking the derivative will give you the original result.

In answer to the question a, I would say that L'hopital's rule applies, either to the expression itself as it's written, or to the denominator when you rewrite it.
 
  • #10
l'hospital's rule DOES apply (okay maybe it doesn't, but it would, if it could)! The numerator is defined on R except at 0. The denominator is defined on all of R. Both are differentiable on their respective natural domains. The derivative of the denominator is nonzero in a deleted nbd of 0. Does limit of the quotient of the derivatives exist though?

You'll want to use the sequential criterion to show that the limit does not exist.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
HallsofIvy said:
So far you haven't said anything about
(a) Explain why L'Hopital's rule does not apply to the problem
limx->0 [ (x[tex]^{2}[/tex]sin(1/x)) / sinx ]

lim x^2 = 0; lim sin(1/x) DNE; lim sinx = 0; 0 * DNE / 0 isn't one of the indeterminant forms.

thanks for the help, everbody :)
 
  • #12
hey,..

l' hopitals rule doesn't apply here because sin(1/x) and cos(1/x) oscilate rapidly at x near zero 1/x is a simple pole at x = 0,... and derivatives of all orders don't get rid of the sin(1/x) and higher derivatives give the term 1/x^n which tends to infinity as x -> 0.

at least i think so
 
  • #13
rdougie said:
lim x^2 = 0; lim sin(1/x) DNE; lim sinx = 0; 0 * DNE / 0 isn't one of the indeterminant forms.

thanks for the help, everbody :)

Not quite. x^2sin(1/x) -> 0 (product of bounded function and one going to zero) so we have 0/0 which is one of the indeterminate forms. Did you even read anything I wrote previously?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K