Solving Line Integrals with Vector Cross Products

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a line integral involving vector cross products in the context of advanced physics and electromagnetism. Participants explore the mathematical formulation of the integral, the orientation of the contour, and the implications of these factors on the calculation.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the integral I=\int {\vec{dl} × \vec A } with \vec A = -\frac {1}{x} \vec a_{z} and questions the limits of integration based on the orientation of \vec{dl}.
  • Another participant clarifies that if the contour lies in the xy-plane, the differential element d\vec{r} can be expressed in terms of dx, dy, and dz, and proposes a specific form for the integral based on the coordinates of points a and b.
  • A participant expresses confusion about how the mathematical formulation accounts for the orientation of the contour, questioning whether the line equation inherently contains this information.
  • Another participant responds that the orientation affects the sign of the vector product in the integral, indicating that changing direction alters the result.
  • There is a discussion about the clarity of diagrams used to represent the contour, with one participant noting that the arrows and numbering may suggest conflicting orientations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the orientation of the contour and its implications for the integral. There is no consensus on how to best represent or interpret the contour in relation to the integral.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of clearly defining the contour and its orientation, as well as the potential confusion arising from diagrams that may not clearly convey this information.

Bassalisk
Messages
946
Reaction score
2
I posted an actual problem in advanced physics but no answer so i will try to get an math part answer from it.

Suppose I have to solve this integral:

I=\int {\vec{dl} × \vec A }

Where \vec A = -\frac {1}{x} \vec a_{z}

So it has only a z component and I have to find the vector cross of the field with the contour depicted in the picture

http://pokit.org/get/img/7ea5523fdd63cfc5c9374a07f6ab8bb6.jpg First question:

For the part 3:

If I take that the \vec dl = - dy \vec {a_y} will I integrate from b to c or from c to b?

In my intuition if I took the minus into the account in the differential there is no need for flipping the c and b, so we would integrate from c to b?

When you vector cross this all, there shouldn't be net y component am i right?

Link to thread in physics:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=630013
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If I read this correctly you have \vec{A}= -(1/x)\vec{k}. d\vec{r}= dx\vec{i}+ dy\vec{j}+ dz\vec{k} and you should have no trouble finding the cross product of those.

But the exact contour is not clear. Are you saying that the entire contour lies in the xy-plane with z= 0? If so, then yes, d\vec{r}= (1/x)dy and, if a= (x_1, y_x, 0) and b= (x_2, y_2, 0) then we can write the straight line from a to b as x= [(x_2- x_1)/(y_2- y_1)](y- y_1)+ x_1. The integral would be
\int_{y_1}^{y_2}\frac{dy}{\frac{x_2- x_1}{y_2- y_1}(y- y_1)+ x_1}
 
HallsofIvy said:
If I read this correctly you have \vec{A}= -(1/x)\vec{k}. d\vec{r}= dx\vec{i}+ dy\vec{j}+ dz\vec{k} and you should have no trouble finding the cross product of those.

But the exact contour is not clear. Are you saying that the entire contour lies in the xy-plane with z= 0? If so, then yes, d\vec{r}= (1/x)dy and, if a= (x_1, y_x, 0) and b= (x_2, y_2, 0) then we can write the straight line from a to b as x= [(x_2- x_1)/(y_2- y_1)](y- y_1)+ x_1. The integral would be
\int_{y_1}^{y_2}\frac{dy}{\frac{x_2- x_1}{y_2- y_1}(y- y_1)+ x_1}

I think I understand.

But can you tell me how can "math" know how I orientated the contour?

Let me show you what I mean.

http://pokit.org/get/img/65e8ba92c1d00bf7fc8be2b178757ed8.jpg If you have a function like in our case for (2) y- \frac{c}{2}=\frac {c}{2b}(x-6b) (a)

How does my equation knows how I orientated the curve? Do I have to manually account for this?

Because (a) is simply a line through 2 points. It does not contain any information about the orientation.

The line integral I have to solve is \vec F = I_{2} \int{\vec {dl} × \vec B}.

And the (3) is not giving me much problems. But (2) is because it has negative slope.

(This is from my EM problem, its a force on a wire problem, check the link provided in first post if you may)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bassalisk said:
But can you tell me how can "math" know how I orientated the contour?

It "knows" which way you go round the contour. If you change direction, the sign of the vector product changes.

IMO your diagram is confusing because without any text to explain it, the arrows on the lines suggest the contour is a - b - c - a, but the numbers 1, 2, 3 suggest the reverse direction, a - c - b - a.
 
AlephZero said:
It "knows" which way you go round the contour. If you change direction, the sign of the vector product changes.

IMO your diagram is confusing because without any text to explain it, the arrows on the lines suggest the contour is a - b - c - a, but the numbers 1, 2, 3 suggest the reverse direction, a - c - b - a.

You have arrow which orients the contour. The 1,2,3 are just there to point out that you should do the problem part by part.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K