Force on triangular current loop: line integrals

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the force on a triangular current loop influenced by a magnetic field generated by an infinitely long wire. The magnetic field is defined as B = -μ₀ I₁ / (2πx) az, and the force on the loop is determined using the formula F = I₂ ∫(dl × B). Participants confirm that the vertical components of the forces cancel due to symmetry, resulting in a net force acting only in the horizontal direction. The correct expression for the differential length element dl is dl = dx ax + dy ay, with the relationship between dy and dx being critical for accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic fields, specifically B = -μ₀ I₁ / (2πx)
  • Familiarity with the right-hand rule for determining force directions
  • Knowledge of line integrals in vector calculus
  • Experience with current loops and electromagnetic theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the magnetic field around a long straight wire using Ampère's Law
  • Learn about the application of the right-hand rule in electromagnetic contexts
  • Explore advanced techniques for solving line integrals in vector fields
  • Investigate the principles of symmetry in physics problems involving forces
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone involved in electromagnetic theory or applications related to current loops and magnetic fields.

Bassalisk
Messages
946
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



http://pokit.org/get/img/65e8ba92c1d00bf7fc8be2b178757ed8.jpg

If a=5b, and I1 and I2 are known, find the force on the triangular loop.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



For start, the field from the infinitely long wire is :

[itex]\vec B=\large -\frac{\mu _{0} I_{1}}{2 \pi x}\vec a_{z}[/itex]

This is understood and very trivial.

To find the total force on the current loop we will divide the problem into 3 parts, and solve forces on the (1) (2) (3) separately, and then add them all up.

For the force we will use the formula:

[itex]\vec F = I_{2} \int{\vec {dl} × \vec B}[/itex]

From this current view I want first question answered:

Will the only [itex]\vec a_{x}[/itex] component of the force be present?

I got that from the right hand rule, part of the y component vector-crossed with -z will give a positive x component.

The part with the x component crossed with the -z component will give both positive and negative contribution, leading to net 0 y component of the force.

Is this correct and if it is, i have further questions regarding the calculations and solving the line integrals, because I am getting weird answers.Namely in case (1) and (2).

Is [itex]\vec{dl} =dx \vec a_{x} + dy \vec a_{y}[/itex] in both cases the same or is in second case [itex]\vec{dl} =-dx \vec a_{x} + dy \vec a_{y}[/itex].

If I use the fact that dl is in both cases the same, I get right results.

But keep in mind that when substituting dy in first case i used:

[itex]\vec{dy}=\frac {c}{2b} dx[/itex]

and in second case:

[itex]\vec{dy}=-\frac {c}{2b} dx[/itex]

I should also add that case 3 is not a problem because I got that right.

If i use [itex]\vec{dl} =-dx \vec a_{x} + dy \vec a_{y}[/itex] I get a net y component of the force which is not right in my intuition.How do you solve these line integrals the right way?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Bassalisk said:

Homework Statement



http://pokit.org/get/img/65e8ba92c1d00bf7fc8be2b178757ed8.jpg

If a=5b, and I1 and I2 are known, find the force on the triangular loop.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



For start, the field from the infinitely long wire is :

[itex]\vec B=\large -\frac{\mu _{0} I_{1}}{2 \pi x}\vec a_{z}[/itex]

This is understood and very trivial.

To find the total force on the current loop we will divide the problem into 3 parts, and solve forces on the (1) (2) (3) separately, and then add them all up.

For the force we will use the formula:

[itex]\vec F = I_{2} \int{\vec {dl} × \vec B}[/itex]

From this current view I want first question answered:

Will the only [itex]\vec a_{x}[/itex] component of the force be present?

I got that from the right hand rule, part of the y component vector-crossed with -z will give a positive x component.

The part with the x component crossed with the -z component will give both positive and negative contribution, leading to net 0 y component of the force.

Is this correct and if it is, i have further questions regarding the calculations and solving the line integrals, because I am getting weird answers.
Yes, you're right. By symmetry, the vertical component of the forces will cancel, so any net force has to act in the horizontal direction.

Namely in case (1) and (2).

Is [itex]\vec{dl} =dx \vec a_{x} + dy \vec a_{y}[/itex] in both cases the same or is in second case [itex]\vec{dl} =-dx \vec a_{x} + dy \vec a_{y}[/itex].

If I use the fact that dl is in both cases the same, I get right results.

But keep in mind that when substituting dy in first case i used:

[itex]\vec{dy}=\frac {c}{2b} dx[/itex]

and in second case:

[itex]\vec{dy}=-\frac {c}{2b} dx[/itex]

I should also add that case 3 is not a problem because I got that right.

If i use [itex]\vec{dl} =-dx \vec a_{x} + dy \vec a_{y}[/itex] I get a net y component of the force which is not right in my intuition.How do you solve these line integrals the right way?
By definition, ##d\vec{l} = dx\,\vec{a}_x + dy\,\vec{a}_y + dz\,\vec{a}_z##. The relative sign dependence of the first two pieces will come in through the relationship between x and y, e.g. y=(2b/c)x or y=-(2b/c)x, and dz=0 for these contours.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
vela said:
Yes, you're right. By symmetry, the vertical component of the forces will cancel, so any net force has to act in the horizontal direction.By definition, ##d\vec{l} = dx\,\vec{a}_x + dy\,\vec{a}_y + dz\,\vec{a}_z##. The relative sign dependence of the first two pieces will come in through the relationship between x and y, e.g. y=(2b/c)x or y=-(2b/c)x, and dz=0 for these contours.

oh so I don't have to account for it in the differential of l?

It will account for it self when I change the dy into dx through that relationship?

Makes sense. Thank you for the answer. I actually did it this way, but this was purely shot in the dark because I knew the final answer.

Thank you for Your help, You have been very helpful.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
64
Views
6K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K