Solving ∫log(1+acosx) by Differentiation Under Integral Sign

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving the integral ∫log(1+acosx) using differentiation under the integral sign, with limits from 0 to π. Participants explore various substitution methods, including using Leibniz's rule and trigonometric identities, to simplify the integral. There is uncertainty about the logarithm's base and the interpretation of "acos(x)," prompting clarifications. Suggestions include using Weierstrass substitution and integration by parts, though participants express skepticism about achieving a tidy solution. The complexity of the problem raises questions about its suitability as a homework exercise, indicating it may require deeper insights or context for simplification.
msmmpts
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



solve ∫log(1+acosx) by differentiation under integral sign (limits are 0 to ∏)



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


=∫(1/1+acosx)cosxdx(by leibinitz by differentiating partially WRT a.

Then how do I proceed,can anyone show me all the steps of reduction to standard integral forms??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF; :)
what is the base of the logarithm?
by "acos(x)" do you mean ##a\cos(x)## or ##\arccos(x)##?
Then how do I proceed,can anyone show me all the steps of reduction to standard integral forms??
No - because that would be against the rules. But we can try pointing you in promising looking directions in the hope you'll figure it out...

I'd have been tempted to sub:
##e^u=1+\arccos(x) \Rightarrow x=\cos(1-e^u);##
... gets rid of both pesky functions at once.
Then I'd look for a further substitution or explore integrating by parts a couple of times.

The other way ... ##e^u=1+a\cos(x)## ;)

hmmm... actually, Leibnitz's rule looks simpler... back in a tick.
 
Last edited:
$$u(\alpha)=\int_0^\pi \ln|1+\alpha\cos(x)|dx = \int_0^\pi f(x,\alpha)dx= \int_0^\pi \frac{\partial}{\partial\alpha}f(x,\alpha)dx$$ ... note that ##\alpha\cos(\pi)=-\alpha## may be less than -1 making the argument of the logarithm negative.

$$\frac{\partial}{\partial\alpha}f(x,\alpha)
=\frac{\partial}{\partial\alpha}\ln|1+\alpha\cos(x)|=\frac{\cos(x)}{1+\alpha\cos(x)}$$... but would this have to be changed if ##|\alpha| > 1##

so you end up with: $$u(\alpha)=\int_0^\pi \frac{\cos(x)}{1+\alpha\cos(x)}dx$$... which is where you are at.

well I suppose you could get rid of the trig functions with ##z=\cos(x)## and the identity ##\sin(\arccos(z))=\sqrt{1-z^2}## but I don't hold out much hope.

the other thing to try is ##\cos(x)=\frac{1}{2}(e^{ix}+e^{-ix})##
 
I suppose there is always looking for p(x) and q(x) satisfying: $$q^2=1+\alpha\cos(x)$$ and $$q\frac{dp}{dx}-p\frac{dq}{dx}=\cos(x)$$... which will give you a first-order DE in p(x) to solve.

Then, by the quotient rule: $$u(\alpha)=\frac{p}{q}$$... nothing looks tidy and a quick squiz at Wolfram's calculator suggests nothing will be.

[note that ##1+\alpha\cos(x)## can be understood as ##|\vec{u}+\vec{v}|## where ##x## is the angle between the two vectors.]
 
Last edited:
Simon Bridge said:
what is the base of the logarithm?
by "acos(x)" do you mean ##a\cos(x)## or ##\arccos(x)##?
No - because that would be against the rules. But we can try pointing you in promising looking directions in the hope you'll figure it out...

I'd have been tempted to sub:
##e^u=1+\arccos(x) \Rightarrow x=\cos(1-e^u);##
... gets rid of both pesky functions at once.
Then I'd look for a further substitution or explore integrating by parts a couple of times.

The other way ... ##e^u=1+a\cos(x)## ;)

hmmm... actually, Leibnitz's rule looks simpler... back in a tick.

it is "acosx"..a is the parameter
 
Simon Bridge said:
$$u(\alpha)=\int_0^\pi \ln|1+\alpha\cos(x)|dx = \int_0^\pi f(x,\alpha)dx= \int_0^\pi \frac{\partial}{\partial\alpha}f(x,\alpha)dx$$ ... note that ##\alpha\cos(\pi)=-\alpha## may be less than -1 making the argument of the logarithm negative.

$$\frac{\partial}{\partial\alpha}f(x,\alpha)
=\frac{\partial}{\partial\alpha}\ln|1+\alpha\cos(x)|=\frac{\cos(x)}{1+\alpha\cos(x)}$$... but would this have to be changed if ##|\alpha| > 1##

so you end up with: $$u(\alpha)=\int_0^\pi \frac{\cos(x)}{1+\alpha\cos(x)}dx$$... which is where you are at.

well I suppose you could get rid of the trig functions with ##z=\cos(x)## and the identity ##\sin(\arccos(z))=\sqrt{1-z^2}## but I don't hold out much hope.

the other thing to try is ##\cos(x)=\frac{1}{2}(e^{ix}+e^{-ix})##

If I could get rid of cosx from numerator,then
we could have substituted tan(x/2)=t
dx=2dt/1+tsquare
cosx=1-tsquare/1+tsquare.

I tried dividing num&denom by cosx but no good.
 
Ah - Weierstrass substitution is probably better earlier than that:$$\ln|1+\alpha\cos(x)| = \ln|1+t^2 -\alpha(1-t^2)|-\ln|1+t^2|$$... but I suspect we'll end up with the same trouble when we try to find f(t): dx=f(t)dt
[edit]since the substitution is ##\tan(\frac{x}{2})=t## then $$dx = \frac{2}{1+t^2}dt$$... still not optimistic [/edit]

I had another look at the substitution: ##e^z=1+\alpha\cos(x) \Rightarrow x=-\arccos(\frac{1-e^z}{\alpha})## because $$dx = -\frac{1}{\alpha}\sqrt{\frac{e^z}{2-e^z}}dz$$... or something.
This would suggest an integration by parts to get rid of the stray z in the integrand, which may lead to hyperbolic functions.

I think that's about the best I can do.
The end result is very messy - the best you can do is try to ease the pain in getting there.

Aside: looks unusually painful for a homework exercise - perhaps there is something in the context that will simplify the problem for you?
 
Last edited:
simon,according to the exercise the final result does not contain any hyperbolic terms.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K