Solving Log Equations: No Simplification Needed

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bazman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Log Simplifying
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 6K views
Bazman
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hi,

To solve the following d.e.:

xdy-ydx = 0 1

you get

ln(y)-ln(x)=C 2

no clearly you can simplify to:

ln(y/x)=c 3

which after taking exponentials gives:

y=Ax where A=e^c 4

however what interests me is if you do not simplify to

ln(y/c) in line 3 but simply take the exponential of line 2

then you get

y-x=A

obviously this is incorrect but I would like to know where I have gone wrong in the step above and also if it possible to get to the correct answer without using the simplification in step 3 above
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Equation (2) reads lny-lnx=C. Taking exponential of both sides yields e(lny-lnx)=A. Simplifying this gives elnye-lnx=elnyelnx-1=yx-1.

Your mistake was saying that e(lny-lnx)=y-x, which is not true.