Solving Logarithmic Equation with TI-89 Titanium: Step-by-Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter hostergaard
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Log
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a logarithmic equation using a TI-89 Titanium calculator. The original poster presents an equation involving logarithms and exponential terms, expressing frustration over previous attempts to simplify or solve it.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants suggest substituting variables and manipulating the equation to form a quadratic equation. There are questions about the placement of negative signs and the feasibility of extracting terms from logarithmic expressions. Some participants also discuss the implications of negative solutions in the context of logarithms.

Discussion Status

The discussion has evolved with various participants offering suggestions and corrections. Some guidance has been provided regarding the quadratic nature of the equation and the properties of logarithms. There is an acknowledgment of mistakes in calculations, and participants are exploring the implications of their findings.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of the original equation and the properties of logarithms, particularly regarding the definition of logarithmic functions for negative values. There is an emphasis on ensuring that solutions remain valid within the context of logarithmic definitions.

hostergaard
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/2327/nummer1.jpg


Homework Equations


If you use ti-89 titanium, you write log with base(b) (c=number) as log(c,b) fx; the log of 3x in base 5 is written log(3x,5) (log5(3x))took me forever to figure out

The Attempt at a Solution


I filled out about 5 handwriten papers with attempts, all which failled. don't force me to write all my attempts since i find this to be very tedius.
simplified, the equation is;
10*5x=3*5-x+1

i put log5 on each side geting:

log5(5x+3)-x=x+log5(10)

then moving it about a bit i get:

2x-log5(5x+3)=log5(10)

But here i get stuck...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try to Substitute: 5^x = y (with some restrictions on y)

You'll end up solving a quadratic equation in y!

Good luck
 
uh? sorry i couldt not get that to work, one of those 5x has a negative sign... (i am not sure i did it right. where in the the proces shuld i put it in?)... sorry, i still need help.
 
Is there any way that i can get 3 out the log (or in a separate) in of 2x-log5(5x+3)
 
You should try phymatast's suggestion again. Multiply both sides by 5^x. Then see if you can pull out any factors and make the equation look like

a 5^{2x} + b 5^x + c.

Since 5^(2x) = (5^x)^2, its just a quadratic equation, like phymatast said.
 
i see, then i get 10*(5x)2-5x-3=0

then:

5x=-(1\pm\sqrt{}-12-4*10*(-3))/2*10

that gives me that
5x=1/2
5x=-3/5

with 5x=-3/5 my calculator goes haywire so gues that's an imposiple answer (because of the -)

then i take log5(5x)=log(1/2)
which gives me x=-log5(2)
which gives me an asnwer that dosent fulfil that the anser shuld be given in a+log5b (exept if i say 0-log52 i quess)

Is that the correct answer tough? need a litlle bit more help here!
 
Check your working in the quadratic formula, it should be -1, not 1 !
 
You shouldn't need the quadratic formula to solve 10y^2- y- 3= (2y+ 1)(5y- 3): which does NOT give y= 1/2, y= -3/5.
 
it's 3/5 and not -3/5 and this will give you your answer using basic properties of logarithmic functions.

hint: after you get 5^x = 3/5

take log base 5 on both sides
 
  • #10
aah, it seem i have made a mistake; the two possible anser is 3/5 and -1/2.
So, -1/2 is imposible (could someone explain why?). that leaves me with 3/5 using log5 on both side i get x =log5(3/5) using the rule that log(a/b)=log(a)+log(b) i get x=log5(5)+log5(3) which is the same as x=1+log5(3)

Heruka, i finnaly got it! thanks guys, you are all great!:biggrin:
 
  • #11
-1/2 is impossible because the original equation would then involve log5(-1/2) and logarithm is defined for negative values of x.
 
  • #12
Rigth stupid me; its because log5(-1/2) Reads
"what power must 5 be raised to, to get -1/2" And it is imposible because you can't get a negative number by raising a positive number.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K