Solving Mechanics Problem with Friction Force

  • Thread starter Thread starter kushan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the minimum constant force required to move two connected blocks on a rough surface, considering friction and a spring. The participants explore various approaches, including the work-energy theorem and Newton's laws, to derive the necessary equations. Key points include the realization that the force must overcome both the friction on the first block and the friction on the second block, which only moves when the spring is sufficiently stretched. Ultimately, it is concluded that the minimum force needed is less than that required for a rigid connection, highlighting the dynamics of the spring's behavior in the system. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the forces at play and the conditions under which the second block begins to move.
kushan
Messages
256
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody ,
I am stuck at this question :frown:,

Homework Statement



Two blocks of masses m=1kg and M =2kg are connected by a non-deformed light spring .They are lying on a rough horizontal surface . The coefficient of friction is 0.4 ,What minimun constant force has to be applied in the horizontal direction to the block m , in order to shift the order block M .

Homework Equations


I came up with work energy conservation theorem
F.x = 1/2 kx^2 +f1.x + 1/2mv^2
(where F is external force
f1is force of friction on m. and v is velocity of mass m)
F-kx-f1=ma1
and when block M is just about to move kx=f2
(here f2 is force of friction on M

, its leading me nowhere .
Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Work with the forces instead of energy.

ehild
 
After working with forces I get
F-umg - uMg = ma

Now how do i find a here?
 
A has to be just a bit greater than zero, so practically zero.


ehild
 
But this is block 1 which will be moving , not block 2 which will be stationary till the last moment
 
What does "shift" mean? You need to made the second block moving. The force F has to be enough to move the first block and stretch the spring. How the first block will move and what is the maximum stretching you can have with the applied constant force F? That stretching of the spring must be enough to overcome the friction of the second block.

ehild
 
Last edited:
I am really not getting ehild can you frame some equations ?
 
Newton's second law for the first mass?

ehild
 
let me try again .
Thanks
Ehild
 
Last edited:
  • #10
kushan said:
Hello everybody ,
I am stuck at this question :frown:,

Homework Statement



Two blocks of masses m=1kg and M =2kg are connected by a non-deformed light spring .They are lying on a rough horizontal surface . The coefficient of friction is 0.4 ,What minimun constant force has to be applied in the horizontal direction to the block m , in order to shift the order block M .

Homework Equations


I came up with work energy conservation theorem
F.x = 1/2 kx^2 +f1.x + 1/2mv^2
(where F is external force
f1is force of friction on m. and v is velocity of mass m)
F-kx-f1=ma1
and when block M is just about to move kx=f2
(here f2 is force of friction on M

, its leading me nowhere .
Any help?

I reconsidered your attempt with work and energy, it might be a better approach as mine one.

Should the block of mass m have non-zero velocity when the bigger block starts moving?

But it would be useful to perform an experiment. What happens when you exert some force on mass m, bigger than f1=μmg?

ehild
 
  • #11
Does anything change in the problem if the spring is replaced with a rigid link?
 
  • #12
Yes, it will.

ehild
 
  • #13
yes ehild , The block with mass m will be moving and spring will be extending .
When it reaches the limit ie kx=uMg the block M will move .
I am not getting how to go about it .which equations to use? confusing!
 
  • #14
Does the mass m need to move at the instant when kx=uMg?

ehild
 
  • #15
I'll rephrase my question: does anything change with regard to the magnitude of the force if the link is rigid?
 
  • #16
voko said:
I'll rephrase my question: does anything change with regard to the magnitude of the force if the link is rigid?

Yes. The smallest force which is enough just to move the bigger mass out of its steady state is less than the force needed to move both blocks together with the same velocity (and acceleration).

See picture. What happens when you connect the weight?

ehild
 

Attachments

  • twoblockspring.JPG
    twoblockspring.JPG
    4.4 KB · Views: 390
Last edited:
  • #17
ehild said:
Yes. The smallest force which is enough just to move the bigger mass out of its steady state is less than the force needed to move both blocks together with the same velocity (and acceleration).

ehild

I do not see how. To move the bigger mass, the spring has to pull it with some force F. To make the spring do it, it must be extended till its reaction force is equal to F. How is that different from a rigid link?
 
  • #18
In case of a rigid link both blocks have to move together. In case of the spring the block pulled by F will start to move if F overcomes friction, but the second block stays in rest until the displacement x of the first block yields enough force to overcome the friction of the second block. The question is what constant force is needed to displace the first block so far.

ehild
 
  • #19
I Think this is the solution...
for the body to accelerate horizontally then the forces on m are
External Force F
Frictional force -mgf
Force due to the spring -kx
Force Due Friction on M MgfMgf=2mgf
F-(mgf+kx)>2mgf
F>3mgf+kx
F>12+kx If k is negligible then
F>12 Newtons
 
  • #20
Ehild , when this force f is doing work .
Will we say F.xo ( where xo is the actual displacement )
or F.x(x is displacement had there been no friction), because of the work done in overcoming friction ?
 
  • #21
F is the applied force. That force will do work if the block moves (that is, when F overcomes friction F>f).
If the displacement is x, the work of the applied force is Fx and the work of friction is fx.

ehild
 
  • #22
Sorry vatsa , the answer isn't 12 Newtons :l
 
  • #23
voko said:
I do not see how. To move the bigger mass, the spring has to pull it with some force F. To make the spring do it, it must be extended till its reaction force is equal to F. How is that different from a rigid link?

F is the applied force, exerted on the first block. On the second block, the elastic force of the spring acts which is not equal to F. It depends on the displacement of the first block.

ehild
 
  • #24
Nobody tried an experiment?
SO: start pulling the first block. Supposed that the force is big enough, the first block starts to accelerate. ma=F-μmg-kx. (You have seen similar equation when a weight is hanged on a vertical spring. What kind of motion is it?) The block accelerates to the right, speeds up, its displacement increases, but the spring force increases, too, so the acceleration decreases, turns to negative and the speed decreases till the block stops at maximum displacement.
The force succeeds to shift the second block when the elastic force at this maximum stretching of the spring is greater than μMg.

ehild
 
  • #25
So the equation would be
kx=uMg
and F-umg-uMg=ma
and F.x=1/2mv^2 + f.x + 1/2kx^2
Which is the nothing but anti derivative of 2nd equation .
What to do after this Ehild?
 
  • #26
I asked already: must v differ to zero to exert force on the second block? read my previous post:"The block accelerates to the right, speeds up, its displacement increases, but the spring force increases, too, so the acceleration decreases, turns to negative and the speed decreases till the block stops at maximum displacement. "

ehild
 
  • #27
your case seems to make block M rigid/fixed , if at a certain time during the accelration of block m
F-umg+kx=ma ,
kx become become greater than friction , the block m will still be moving and M will start to move .
It is impossible for block m to return back as we can consider spring to be internal , and
combinning both masses m and M to form m+M
will give equation
F.x= 1/2mv^2+ fx
which clearly shows v cannot fall or become negative
 
Last edited:
  • #28
Omg , I get it all now ...
 
  • #29
Ehild is it same as a a block vertically hanging , with charge q , so two forces are acting on it and it does shm ?
 
  • #30
kushan said:
Ehild is it same as a a block vertically hanging , with charge q , so two forces are acting on it and it does shm ?

something like that...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
969
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K