Solving Mechanics Problems with (1)-(4)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mentallic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a mechanics problem involving forces in a system with uniform circular motion. Participants are analyzing the relationships between tension, gravitational force, and the components of motion in both horizontal and vertical directions.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of equations related to angular velocity, centripetal force, and tension in strings. There are attempts to derive expressions for horizontal and vertical components of forces, with some questioning the assumptions made about net forces and the role of tension.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the relationships between the forces involved, with some participants providing insights into the contributions of tension to centripetal force. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being discussed, and while guidance has been offered, there is no explicit consensus on the next steps or final equations to solve.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may involve assumptions about equilibrium in the vertical direction, and there is uncertainty regarding the correct application of trigonometric relationships in the context of the problem. Some participants express confusion about the algebraic manipulation required to solve for the tensions.

Mentallic
Homework Helper
Messages
3,802
Reaction score
95

Homework Statement


http://img21.imageshack.us/img21/3430/mechanics3.jpg

Homework Equations



w=\frac{d\theta}{dt} (1)

v=rw (2)

F=ma (3)

a=\frac{v^2}{r} (4)



The Attempt at a Solution


For (i) to find the horizontal component I used (2) and (4) to get a=rw^2 and r=l.cos\alpha hence a=l.cos\alpha.w^2
But I have no idea for the vertical component. I just keep guessing at that one.

I think I'll need the answer to (i) before I can answer (ii)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
r=l\sin(\alpha) if you draw out the triangle.

In this case of uniform circular motion, the horizontal component of force would be the centripetal force keeping the object in circular motion.

Don't forget that both tensions contribute to the centripetal force, so T_{1x}+T_{2x}=lm\omega^{2}\sin(\alpha).

The vertical net force on P would have a magnitude equal to the vector sum of the vertical components of the two tension forces and gravity. Although not explicitly stated by the problem, the vertical net force is probably 0, so F_{net,y}=0=T_{1y}-T_{2y}-mg (with up as positive).

Btw, most of these look like they should be in the physics section o.o
 
zcd said:
r=l\sin(\alpha) if you draw out the triangle.
Ahh yes thanks for correcting me on that.

zcd said:
Don't forget that both tensions contribute to the centripetal force, so T_{1x}+T_{2x}=lm\omega^{2}\sin(\alpha).
So then the force F=ma is equivalent to the tension's of each string holding it in place? Ahh that makes sense :smile:

So F_x=T_{1x}+T_{2x}=lm\omega^{2}\sin\alpha


zcd said:
The vertical net force on P would have a magnitude equal to the vector sum of the vertical components of the two tension forces and gravity.
This too makes sense :smile:

zcd said:
Although not explicitly stated by the problem, the vertical net force is probably 0, so F_{net,y}=0=T_{1y}-T_{2y}-mg (with up as positive).
It's always assumed zero for our course, unless otherwise stated.
Why is it the negative of T_{2y} and not the positive? Maybe because its significance is that it keeps the mass pulled downwards?

zcd said:
Btw, most of these look like they should be in the physics section o.o
Actually I've already learned basics of motion in physics, but we were studying this in maths. We also haven't learned about vectors, so please bare with me here.
 
Uhh I'm a little worried what I tried is again, incorrect.

T_{1y}=l.cos\alpha yes?

But also, T_{2y}=l.cos\alpha by the looks of it.

Hence, mg=0 ? which doesn't sound right...
 
Mentallic said:
Hence, mg=0 ? which doesn't sound right...

Looks can be deceiving.
 
...but in this case they're not. lcos(a) is half the height of the apparatus, not the tension. To use cos(a), you can express Ty in terms of the total tension, T:

T1y=T1cos(a)
T2y=T2cos(a)
 
So uh...

T_{1y}-T_{2y}-mg=cos\alpha(T_1-T_2)-mg=0

cos\alpha(T_1-T_2)=mg (1)

T_{1x}+T_{2x}=sin\alpha(T_1+T_2)=lmw^2sin\alpha

T_1-T_2=lmw^2 (2)

I'm unsure what to do now. I'm thinking both tensions are supposed to be solved simultaneously, but I wouldn't be able to eliminate both tensions with just 2 equations.
 
The problem was asking for forces in vertical and horizontal directions, and that seems to have finished the job. If you want to solve for |\vec{T}_{1}| or |\vec{T}_{2}|, note that:
T_{1y}=T_{1}\sin(\alpha)
T_{1x}=T_{1}\cos(\alpha)
T_{1y}=T_{1x}\tan(\alpha)
and proceed with the algebra
 
Then if T_{1y}=T_{1x}tan\alpha , T_{2y}=T{2x}tan\alpha

and T_{1x}+T_{2x}=lm\omega^2sin\alpha

then cot\alpha(T_{1y}+T_{2y})=lm\omega^2sin\alpha

So the best I can do with this is: T_{1y}+T_{2y}=lm\omega^2sin\alpha tan\alpha

When you say proceed with the algebra, sure I have no problem doing that for other topics, but in this which is very new to me, all I'm seeing is a big mess where I have a bunch of equations that don't make sense to me... Could you please direct me to which equations I need to be solving for? Maybe F_x with something else?
 
  • #10
Instead of grouping into the same directional component (x in that case), you could try to reduce it to components of the same tension force. For example:
T_{1x}-T_{2x}=mg\cot(\alpha)
T_{1x}+T_{2x}=lm\omega^{2}\sin(\alpha)
system of equations

T_{1x}=\frac{1}{2}(mg\cot(\alpha)+lm\omega^{2}\sin(\alpha))
T_{1}=\frac{1}{2}(mg\sec(\alpha)+lm\omega^{2}\tan(\alpha))
is that what the question is asking for?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K