Solving Moment Equations with Newton's 2nd Law: Help Needed!

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving moment equations using Newton's 2nd law in a mechanics problem involving pulleys and blocks. Participants explore the setup of equations, the implications of choosing different pivot points, and the calculation of angular and linear accelerations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes setting up three equations, including a moment equation about point G and two equations from Newton's 2nd law, but encounters incorrect answers when plugging in numbers.
  • Another participant suggests that there was a sign error in the equations related to the blocks' accelerations, indicating that if one block accelerates up, the other must accelerate down.
  • A question is raised about the implications of choosing point A (the right rope's contact point) as the pivot, with the participant suggesting that the angular acceleration would be zero since the pulley does not rotate about that point.
  • A later reply proposes that there may be two angular accelerations to consider: one for the pulley’s rotation about its center of mass and another for the center of mass's motion about point A, with the latter being zero.
  • Another participant offers a simpler approach, discussing the need to calculate the moment of inertia of the pulley and how the applied torque relates to the angular acceleration and the linear accelerations of the blocks.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the choice of pivot point and the resulting implications for angular acceleration. There is no consensus on the best approach to solving the problem, and multiple competing views remain regarding the setup and calculations.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the system's behavior and the definitions of angular acceleration may not be fully resolved. The discussion includes references to specific equations and concepts that may require further clarification or context.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and practitioners in physics or engineering who are dealing with problems involving rotational dynamics, pulleys, and the application of Newton's laws.

Pipsqueakalchemist
Messages
138
Reaction score
20
Homework Statement
Question and attempt below
Relevant Equations
Newton's 2nd law
Moment equation
So I set up 3 equation for this problem. 1st was the moment equation about point G, 2nd and 3rd were from applying Newton's 2nd law to each of the blocks. I thought once I set those equations up I could solve for alpha (angular acceleration) and then find acceleration of each block but when i plug in the numbers I get the wrong answers. Did I do something wrong?
 

Attachments

  • Sample 16.4.png
    Sample 16.4.png
    50.4 KB · Views: 266
  • Sample 16.4. attempt.JPG
    Sample 16.4. attempt.JPG
    37.3 KB · Views: 254
Physics news on Phys.org
You made a sign error in the equation for one of the blocks. Remember if one accelerates up, the other one accelerates down.
 
Oh i see thanks. I also had another question. Say I took a different point rather than G, say A, the point of the right rope in contact with the circle. Then the alpha (angular acceleration) would be zero when I set up my moment equation right bc the circle isn’t rotating about point A. Is that correct?
 
I'm not entirely sure how the problem works out with that choice. My inclination is to think there would be two angular accelerations, the usual one pertaining to the pulley's rotation about its center of mass and one describing the motion of the center of mass of the pulley about point A. The latter one would be zero.

EDIT:

If you choose A as the origin, the angular momentum of the pulley is given by
$$L_A = Rmv_{\rm cm} + I_G\omega = (mR^2)\omega_{\rm cm} + I_{\rm cm}\omega$$ where ##\omega## is the usual angular velocity about the center of mass and ##\omega_{\rm cm}## describes the motion of the center of mass about A. That term vanishes because the pulley doesn't rotate about A, but if we keep it around a moment, differentiating would give
$$\tau_A = \frac{dL_A}{dt} = (mR^2)\alpha_{\rm cm} + I_G\alpha.$$ The fact that the pulley doesn't rotate about A tells us ##\alpha_{\rm cm} = 0## but it doesn't say anything about the usual rotation of the pulley about its axis.

If you calculate the torque on the pulley about A, taking into account the weight and the reaction force from the support, you should end up with the same net torque as before. So in the end, you get the same equation as when you use G as the origin.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
Pipsqueakalchemist said:
... I thought once I set those equations up I could solve for alpha (angular acceleration) and then find acceleration of each block but when i plug in the numbers I get the wrong answers. Did I do something wrong?
I believe that a simpler approach to this problem could help.
The system of multiple weights and strings and pulleys create a unique counter-clockwise torque or moment about the actual axis of rotation named G in the diagram.

That applied torque has to overcome the rotational inertia of the pulley's mass in order to establish an increasing rotational velocity at a constant rate or angular acceleration, increasing the angular momentum of the pulley, as well as the linear momentum of each of masses A and B.

Since we have the values of the radius of gyration and mass of the pulley, we can calculate its moment of inertia (I).
If we divide the applied moment and I, we can calculate the value of the angular acceleration of the pulley, and therefore, the linear accelerations of A and B.

Please, see:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radius_of_gyration

https://courses.lumenlearning.com/p...mics-of-rotational-motion-rotational-inertia/

:cool:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K