Solving Physics Problem: Sphere & Charge Sheet

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the speed of a small sphere with a mass of 5.00×10−7 kg and a charge of +6.00 μC when released from a height of 0.400 m above a charged sheet with a surface charge density of +8.00 pC/m2. Initially, the calculation ignored gravitational effects, leading to an incorrect speed of 1.8 m/s. After incorporating gravity (9.81 m/s2) into the energy conservation equation, the correct speed was determined to be 1.62 m/s. The final formula used was mgh = σql/2ε + 0.5mv2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of energy conservation principles in physics
  • Familiarity with electric fields and forces, specifically E = σ/2ε
  • Knowledge of gravitational potential energy, mgh
  • Ability to perform calculus-based integration for electric potential
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of energy conservation equations in electrostatics
  • Learn about the effects of varying gravitational acceleration on charged particles
  • Explore the concept of electric field direction and its impact on charged objects
  • Investigate the relationship between potential energy and kinetic energy in dynamic systems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on electromagnetism and energy conservation, as well as educators looking for practical examples of these concepts in action.

wormwoodsilver101
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A small sphere with mass 5.00×10−7 kg and charge +6.00 μC is released from rest a distance of 0.400 m above a large horizontal insulating sheet of charge that has uniform surface charge density σ = +8.00 pC/m2.Using energy methods, calculate the speed of the sphere when it is
0.100 m above the sheet.

Homework Equations


V=integrate(E dl) from a to b
E=σ/2ε

The Attempt at a Solution


σql/2ε=0.5mv^2
(8*10^-12)(6*10^-6)(0.4-0.1)/2ε=0.5(5*10^-7)v^2
v=1.8m/s
But mastering physics keeps saying it is wrong
I don't know what did I did wrong
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Wormwood, :welcome:

What if gravity were 19.62 m/s2 instead of 9.81 m/s2 ? Would it go just as fast then ?
 
What about gravity?
 
Both charges are positive, so why did it fall?
 
Ah, I totally ignored gravity >.<
With gravity the formula is:
mgh=σql/2ε+0.5mv^2
(5*10^-7)(9.81)(0.4-0.1)=(8*10^-12)(6*10^-6)(0.4-0.1)/2ε+0.5(5*10^-7)v^2
v=1.62m/s
The answer is finally correct.
Thanks for all the help >.<
 
wormwoodsilver101 said:
Ah, I totally ignored gravity >.<
With gravity the formula is:
mgh=σql/2ε+0.5mv^2
(5*10^-7)(9.81)(0.4-0.1)=(8*10^-12)(6*10^-6)(0.4-0.1)/2ε+0.5(5*10^-7)v^2
v=1.62m/s
The answer is finally correct.
Thanks for all the help >.<
Hey I understood the gravity was missing. But I still don't get how you arrived to this formula from the energy conservation. a and b refer to the initial and final positions.
If Ka+Uag+Uael=Kb+Ubg+Ubel and Ka=0 (at rest) and Ug=mgh and Uel=qEh
Then mgha + qEha = 0.5mv^2 + mghb + qEhb
Then v^2 = 2(mg+qE)(ha-hb)/m right? In your answer it seems like you had mg-qE instead of mg+qE!
And I think you're right about this but can you help me identify my mistake?
 
What are the directions of the gravitational and electric fields? (Bear in mind F = -dE/dx)
 
  • Like
Likes JAAZeid
mjc123 said:
What are the directions of the gravitational and electric fields? (Bear in mind F = -dE/dx)
Ok so, both, the particle and the sheet, are positively charged therefore the electric forces are repulsive. So on the particle it's weight is mg(down) and the electric force on it is qE(up)!
But does this allow us to switch to a negative sign while working with Energies?
 
Yes; gravitational potential energy increases with height, electrical decreases with height. (Actually whether the energy is positive or negative depends on what you take as your zero, which is arbitrary, but the important thing is that the change from 0.4m to 0.1m is positive for one and negative for the other.)
 
  • Like
Likes JAAZeid
  • #10
mjc123 said:
Yes; gravitational potential energy increases with height, electrical decreases with height. (Actually whether the energy is positive or negative depends on what you take as your zero, which is arbitrary, but the important thing is that the change from 0.4m to 0.1m is positive for one and negative for the other.)
Thank you man! that was very helpful!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K