Solving Plane Equation 3x + 2y -z = 4

  • Thread starter Thread starter Darkmisc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plane
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the Cartesian equation of a plane that is perpendicular to the given plane described by the equation 3x + 2y - z = 4, and that passes through two specific points, P(1, 2, 4) and Q(-1, 3, 2). Participants are exploring the relationships between the normal vectors of the planes and the points involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the vector form of the plane and the normal vector associated with it. There is an exploration of whether certain points lie on the plane in question and the implications of using the cross product to find normals. Questions arise about the correctness of assumptions regarding points and the relationships between the normals of the planes.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing with various interpretations being explored. Some participants have provided guidance on the normal vectors and their relationships, while others are questioning the assumptions made about the points and the calculations involved. There is no explicit consensus yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential errors in identifying points on the given plane and the implications of these errors on the overall approach. There is a recognition of the need to verify the correctness of the normal vectors and their perpendicularity.

Darkmisc
Messages
222
Reaction score
31
Homework Statement
Find a Cartesian equation of the plane that is at right angles to the plane with the equation 3x + 2y - z =4 and goes through the points P(1, 2, 4) and Q(-1, 3, 2).
Relevant Equations
r⋅n=a⋅n
Hi everyone

One of the numbers in my attempt would hint that I have gotten something backwards in this question, but I can't see how.

1678770494783.png

For the plane 3x + 2y -z = 4, I've assumed the vector form is
r⋅(3i+2j -k) = 4. That is, (3i+2j -k) is the normal to the plane.

That being so, (3i+2j -k) will be parallel to plane that I am solving for. I'm going to use (3, 2, -1) as a point, M, on the plane relative to the origin.

PQ = (-2, 1, -2)
PM = (2, 0, -5)

The direction of PQxPM will be normal to the plane that I'm solving for.
PQxPM = n = -5i - 14j -2k

P⋅n and Q⋅n both give -41. The correct answer is -3x + 8y + 7z = 41.

I get -5x - 14y -2 = -41.

Does the -41 indicate that I'm on the right track, but with something flipped? Or have I taken the completely wrong approach?

Can someone show me how to solve this?Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Darkmisc said:
That is, (3i+2j -k) is the normal to the (given) plane.

That being so, (3i+2j -k) will be parallel to plane that I am solving for. I'm going to use (3, 2, -1) as a point, M, on the plane relative to the origin.
Why do you think M is in the plane you are looking for?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Darkmisc
Darkmisc said:
Homework Statement:: Find a Cartesian equation of the plane that is at right angles to the plane with the equation 3x + 2y - z =4 and goes through the points P(1, 2, 4) and Q(-1, 3, 2).
Relevant Equations:: r⋅n=a⋅n

Hi everyone

One of the numbers in my attempt would hint that I have gotten something backwards in this question, but I can't see how.

View attachment 323596
For the plane 3x + 2y -z = 4, I've assumed the vector form is
r⋅(3i+2j -k) = 4. That is, (3i+2j -k) is the normal to the plane.

That being so, (3i+2j -k) will be parallel to plane that I am solving for. I'm going to use (3, 2, -1) as a point, M, on the plane relative to the origin.

PQ = (-2, 1, -2)
PM = (2, 0, -5)
(3, 2, -1) is a point on the given plane, but as the other responder said, you can't assume that's on the plane whose equation you need to find.
Darkmisc said:
The direction of PQxPM will be normal to the plane that I'm solving for.
PQxPM = n = -5i - 14j -2k
That's the right idea, but you don't have the right normal to the new plane. For the plane you're trying to find, I get a normal of <3, -8, -7>. I have used this to determine the equation of the new plane, and have verified that the two given points satisfy the equation I found.
Darkmisc said:
P⋅n and Q⋅n both give -41. The correct answer is -3x + 8y + 7z = 41.
I got an equivalent version of this equation -- namely, 3x - 8y - 7z = -41.
Darkmisc said:
I get -5x - 14y -2 = -41.

Does the -41 indicate that I'm on the right track, but with something flipped? Or have I taken the completely wrong approach?
I think it's probably just a coincidence.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Darkmisc
Mark44 said:
(3, 2, 1) is a point on the given plane
I assume you meant (3, 2, -1), but that does not satisfy the equation of the given plane either.
 
Mark44 said:
(3, 2, 1) is a point on the given plane
haruspex said:
I assume you meant (3, 2, -1), but that does not satisfy the equation of the given plane either.
Yes, I meant (3, 2, -1). I've edited my earlier post to correct it. The OP came up with the point (3, 2, -1) in error.

Other than my typo above, which I didn't use in my calculations, the rest of my post is still accurate.
 
Right. If planes are perpendicular, so are their normal vectors. Are your candidate vectors perpendicular?
 
WWGD said:
Right. If planes are perpendicular, so are their normal vectors. Are your candidate vectors perpendicular?
You're late to the party. I'm sure that the OP is aware of this, as he/she used the cross product to get a normal of the plane to be found.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS and WWGD
Mark44 said:
Yes, I meant (3, 2, -1). I've edited my earlier post to correct it. The OP came up with the point (3, 2, -1) in error.

Other than my typo above, which I didn't use in my calculations, the rest of my post is still accurate.
The given plane is ##3x+2y-z=4##. (3, 2, -1) satisfies ##3x+2y-z=14##, no?
Quite possibly that does not matter to your method.
 
haruspex said:
The given plane is ##3x+2y-z=4##. (3, 2, -1) satisfies ##3x+2y-z=14##, no?
Quite possibly that does not matter to your method.
No, it doesn't matter, although I misspoke when I said that the point (3, 2, -1) is on the given plane, or the point (3, 2, 1) for that matter. I'm glad you are catching these mistakes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K