Solving Precal Problems: Ellipses & Hyperbolas

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around two challenging precalculus problems involving a hyperbola and an ellipse. The first problem requires rewriting the hyperbola equation x^2 + 4xy + y^2 - 12 = 0 in standard form, with participants noting that it cannot be aligned along the x or y axes, thus complicating the transformation. The second problem involves finding the height of an elliptical arch at a specific distance from the center, which participants successfully solved by determining the correct values for a and b in the standard ellipse equation. Ultimately, the first equation defines a hyperbola but cannot be simplified to the standard form due to its orientation. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding quadratic forms and transformations in solving these types of precalculus problems.
vitaly
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Here are two problems that stumped our entire precal class. And we have a test soon, so I would like to be able to know how to work these type of problems.

1. Write the equation of the hyperbola, x^2 + 4xy + y^2 - 12 = 0, in standard form.
Okay, I know the formula needs to be x^2/a^2 - y^2/b^2 = 1, but I can't get it into that form... Is there a possibility that there is a typo. But, on the other hand, I checked to see if this is indeed a hyperbola, so I used the
B^2 - 4AC rule, and the result was greater than zero. That should mean the equation is a hyperbola or two intersecting lines. The problem is only getting it into standard form. Any ideas?

2. An arch in a cathedral has the shape of the top half an ellipse and is 40 feet wide and 12 feet high from the center from the floor. Find the height of the arch at 10 feet from the center?
I tried a lot of things, in desperation. Unfortunately, there are no examples in my book, and I couldn't find any online. I tried putting it into standard form of x^2/a^2 + y^2/b^2 = 1, but nothing worked. I can position the ellipse to be in the center, so a possible point would be (0,12), but I don't know where to go from there. All help is appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Have you tried completing the square for the first one?
 
If the equation contains both an x^2 and a y^2 i do not believe that would result in a parabola... if it is you've got me stumped.
 
Jameson said:
If the equation contains both an x^2 and a y^2 i do not believe that would result in a parabola... if it is you've got me stumped.

Where is a parabola mentioned in the question?


For question 2, you just need to pick values of a and b in the standard ellipse equation so that the ellipse has the correct shape (so that (0, 12) and (20, 0) are points on the ellipse). Then plug in the value of x that you are given and solve for the value of y.
 
Yes, I've tried completing the square. I got a strange answer, however. I'm just going to have to ask my teacher for help.

And thank you, master_coda, for help with number 2. The equation turned out to be 10^2/20^2 + y^2/12^2 = 1; where y = 10.4, which is the needed answer.
 
You can't get #1 into that form because it isn't possible. The equation does indeed define a hyperbola, but it is not aligned along the x or y axes, and thus it does not have the form you seek.

In fact, with a little knowledge of quadratic forms and some linear algebra, you can figure out that its semimajor axis is parallel to the vector (1\ , \ 1) (and semiminor axis parallel to (-1 \ , \ 1)).

Using the transformation of coordinates u = x+y and v = x - y gives the equation

3u^2 - v^2 = 24 \Longleftrightarrow \frac{u^2}{8} - \frac{v^2}{24} = 1

for the hyperbola.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top