MHB Solving Quadratic Equations without CD: Better Direction?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores a method for solving quadratic equations without relying on traditional approaches. It suggests using a substitution, setting u = x + x^{-1}, which simplifies the problem into a cubic equation. The cubic equation u^3 + u^2 - 2u - 30 is factored, leading to solutions for u. Completing the square in x allows for the determination of specific roots based on the value of u. This method provides a streamlined approach to solving quadratic equations effectively.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
image_58c02a2c-ed92-432b-b126-3cc91b934a6920220115_111052.jpg

ok this was posted on LinkedIn and sure it has already be answered
but usually these types of problems are resolved by way too many steps
so just wanted to proceed with this without looking at previous attempts

my first reaction was to get a CD but would introduce a bigger problem
however with the exp i presume you could do this by Quadratics and grouping

or is there a better direction?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Set u = x + x^{-1}. Then x^2 + x^{-2} = u^2 - 2 and x^3 + x^{-3} = u^3 - 3u so that u^3 + u^2 - 2u - 30 = (u- 3)(u^2 + 4u - 10) = 0. Then completing the square in x gives <br /> (2x - u)^2 = u^2 - 4 and the choice u = 3 leads directly to <br /> (2x - 3)^2 = 5. The other roots u = -2 \pm \sqrt{14} lead to <br /> x^2 + 2x \mp \sqrt{14}x + 1 = 0.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes dextercioby, fresh_42 and topsquark
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top