Solving seperable wavefunction in 2D infintie square well using parity operator

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the wavefunction for a particle in a 2D infinite square well using the parity operator. The wavefunction is separable, expressed as Ψ(x,y) = X(x)Y(y), with potential U(x,y) = 0 in the defined region and infinite elsewhere. The user correctly identifies the forms of X(x) and Y(y) for odd and even quantum numbers. They inquire about combining these results to derive the total wavefunction with respect to parity conditions. The response confirms the correctness of their approach while suggesting simplification by redefining the quantum numbers.
Qbit42
Messages
45
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You are given in a earlier stage of this problem that the wavefunction is separable, ie.)

\Psi(x,y) = X(x)Y(y)

The problem asks you to solve for the wavefunction of a particle trapped in a 2D infinite square well using Parity. ie.) solve

\Psi(-x,-y) = \Psi(x,y) and \Psi(-x,-y) = -\Psi(x,y).

The potential is defined by U(x,y) = 0 if -a \leq x \leq a and -b \leq y \leq b and infinite everywhere else.

Homework Equations


Since the wavefunction is separable I just solved the 1D infinite square potential for both X(x) and Y(y). The results are:

X(x) = ACos(\frac{n\pi x}{2a}) for n odd and X(x) = ASin(\frac{n\pi x}{2a}) for n even

and Likewise for Y(y)

My question is can I just combine these two results together to get the parity solutions for the total wavefunction?

\Psi(-x,-y) = \Psi(x,y)

\Psi(x,y) = ACos(\frac{n_{x}\pi x}{2a})Cos(\frac{n_{y}\pi y}{2b}) n_{x} odd, n_{y} odd

\Psi(x,y) = ASin(\frac{n_{x}\pi x}{2a})Sin(\frac{n_{y}\pi y}{2b}) n_{x} even, n_{y} even

\Psi(-x,-y) = -\Psi(x,y)

\Psi(x,y) = ACos(\frac{n_{x}\pi x}{2a})Sin(\frac{n_{y}\pi y}{2b}) n_{x} odd, n_{y} even

\Psi(x,y) = ASin(\frac{n_{x}\pi x}{2a})Cos(\frac{n_{y}\pi y}{2b}) n_{x} even, n_{y} odd

Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Those are correct, but you can simplify them by considering n = 2k + 1 when n is odd and n =2k when n is even. It cuts down on the number of separate cases you need to list.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
13K
Replies
3
Views
2K