Solving Sequence: Prove Decreasing with n

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dextercioby
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
9 replies · 3K views
Messages
13,416
Reaction score
4,223
So I was trying to show that

[tex]a_n = n \tan\frac{\pi}{n}[/tex]

is decreasing as n increases (n>=3) . I can't see it. Anyone may help ? :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
tan x = x + 1/3x3 + 2/15x5 + 17/315x7 + ...for |x| < π/2, so expand an and subtract from it an+1 and you should see this
 
I was aiming at a method from first principles (tangent is the ratio of sine and cosine), without derivatives, because I know that I can take n from N (>=3) to the real subset [3,infty) and analyze the sign of the first derivative of the function. It's negative for x>0, hence the function keeps decreasing as x increases. Then the monotonicity of the sequence follows.

Your definition of tangent needs to be proven equivalent to the triangle one.
 
I tried the tangent difference identities and such but it does not help. I think it is best to use the sine-tangent inequality to evaluate the derivative of sine and cosine, and then using them to evaluate the derivative of tangent. I doubt there is any better way using elementary means.
 
Going further, the proof I'm searching reduces to show that once [itex]\displaystyle{n\in \mathbb{N}}[/itex], the sequence

[tex]a_n = n \sin\frac{1}{n}[/tex]

increases with n.

How do I prove it ?
 
dextercioby said:
Going further, the proof I'm searching reduces to show that once [itex]\displaystyle{n\in \mathbb{N}}[/itex], the sequence

[tex]a_n = n \sin\frac{1}{n}[/tex]

increases with n.

How do I prove it ?

I'm not sure about this, but here's what I thought.

You can try seeing whether n increases faster than sin(1/n) decreases, by taking their derivatives(or some other method). You'll reach to the conclusion that n does increase at a faster rate than sin(1/n) decreases, hence, your original function increases.
 
I think you did not understand his point. We can easily differentiate the function and conclude that it increases everywhere because it has a positive derivative. He wants a proof that includes only trigonometric identities, and I am sceptic about whether it is possible to present such a proof.

I think that the first thing to do would be to express one of the sines in terms of the other one. To do this, I used this course of action:
[tex]\frac{1}{n}-\frac{1}{n+1}=\frac{1}{n(n+1)}[/tex]
Then, I conclude that [itex]\frac{1}{n+1}+\frac{1}{n(n+1)}=\frac{1}{n}[/itex]. I now tried to apply this to the sine sum formula as follows:
[tex]\sin\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)=\sin\left(\frac{1}{n+1}+\frac{1}{n(n+1)}\right)[/tex]
[tex]=\sin\left(\frac{1}{n+1}\right)\cos\left(\frac{1}{n(n+1)}\right)+[/tex]
[tex]\cos\left(\frac{1}{n+1}\right)\sin\left(\frac{1}{n(n+1)}\right)[/tex]
I then rearranged this into the inequality
[tex]n\sin\left(\frac{1}{n+1}\right)\cos\left(\frac{1}{n(n+1)}\right)+n\cos\left(\frac{1}{n+1}\right)\sin\left(\frac{1}{n(n+1)}\right) \leq n\sin\left(\frac{1}{n+1}\right)+\sin\left(\frac{1}{n+1}\right)[/tex]
which can be rewritten as
[tex]n\cos\left(\frac{1}{n(n+1)}\right)+n\cot\left(1/(n+1)\right)\sin\left(\frac{1}{n(n+1)}\right)\leq n+1[/tex]
It is straightforward to show that the first term in the LHS is less than or equal to n, so it appears we only need to prove
[tex]\cot\left(\frac{1}{n+1}\right)\sin\left(\frac{1}{n(n+1)}\right)\leq 1/n[/tex]
I am stuck here. This inequality is equivalent to the above function increasing monotonically.

Can anyone carry this on?

Note: After graphing the function using a program, I am convinced that the inequality holds when n is greater than one, and even more: 1/n and this function is asymptotic, their quotient has a limit of one.
 
Last edited:
Millennial said:
[tex]\cot\left(\frac{1}{n+1}\right)\sin\left(\frac{1}{n(n+1)}\right)\leq 1/n[/tex]
I am stuck here. This inequality is equivalent to the above function increasing monotonically.

Can anyone carry this on?

Here's what I did,

We know that sin(x) < x, for all x.

[tex]sin\left ( \frac{1}{n(n+1)} \right ) < \frac{1}{n(n+1)}[/tex]

Substituting in the inequality Millennial had,

[tex]cot\left ( \frac{1}{n+1} \right ) \cdot \frac{1}{n(n+1)} \leq \frac{1}{n} \\<br /> <br /> cot\left ( \frac{1}{n+1} \right ) \cdot \frac{1}{n+1} \leq 1[/tex]Having n>2 it follows that,

[tex]tan\left ( \frac{1}{n+1} \right ) \cdot (n+1) \geq 1[/tex]

We know that tan(x) > x for any x. Hence at the least possible condition, let us assume tan(x) = x. So we get,

[tex]\left ( \frac{1}{n+1} \right )\cdot (n+1) \geq 1[/tex]

Hence the proof.

Please tell me if there is a gap in my logic, as this I've not much practice with such questions :smile:
 
Infinitum said:
Here's what I did,

We know that sin(x) < x, for all x.

[tex]sin\left ( \frac{1}{n(n+1)} \right ) < \frac{1}{n(n+1)}[/tex]

Substituting in the inequality Millennial had,

[tex]cot\left ( \frac{1}{n+1} \right ) \cdot \frac{1}{n(n+1)} \leq \frac{1}{n} \\<br /> <br /> cot\left ( \frac{1}{n+1} \right ) \cdot \frac{1}{n+1} \leq 1[/tex]


Having n>2 it follows that,

[tex]tan\left ( \frac{1}{n+1} \right ) \cdot (n+1) \geq 1[/tex]

We know that tan(x) > x for any x. Hence at the least possible condition, let us assume tan(x) = x. So we get,

[tex]\left ( \frac{1}{n+1} \right )\cdot (n+1) \geq 1[/tex]

Hence the proof.

Please tell me if there is a gap in my logic, as this I've not much practice with such questions :smile:

Yes, that is quite elegant. I did not see that, probably due to me being busy with other questions. Thanks for your help with my proof :)
 
Millennial said:
Yes, that is quite elegant. I did not see that, probably due to me being busy with other questions. Thanks for your help with my proof :)

Yay! I was solving some integrals too, this was a fun break :biggrin:

Your method to get that inequality was really insightful. Probably wouldn't ever have thought of manipulating it that way. Thanks for the idea!