Solving SHM of Cube Connected By Rubber Bands

  • Thread starter Thread starter NATURE.M
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cube Rubber Shm
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a cube of mass m connected to two rubber bands, exploring the conditions under which the system exhibits simple harmonic motion (SHM) when displaced. The original poster attempts to derive the angular frequency ω while considering the effects of tension and gravity on the system's dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of free body diagrams and the approximation of small angles. There is a debate about the necessity of neglecting gravity to simplify the problem. Some participants suggest a change of variables to reformulate the differential equation, while others express uncertainty about the implications of this change.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations of the problem setup being explored. Some participants have provided insights into the mathematical formulation, while others are seeking clarification on specific concepts, such as the change of variables and the role of gravity in the analysis.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the problem not explicitly addressing gravity, leading to differing assumptions about the system's conditions. Additionally, participants note their varying levels of familiarity with differential equations, which affects their engagement with the mathematical aspects of the discussion.

NATURE.M
Messages
298
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A cube of mass m is connected to two rubber bands of length L, each under tension T. The cube is displaced by a small distance y perpendicular to the length of the rubber bands. Assume the tension doesn't change. Show that the system exhibits SHM, and find its angular freqency ω.

The Attempt at a Solution



So basically from a FBD of cube, I have vertical forces: -2Tsinθ - mg = m[itex]\frac{d^2y}{dt^2}[/itex] and the horizontal components of tension from each band cancels. Now since the cube is displaced by a small distance y, I assume we can approximate sinθ ≈ θ. But then I'm not sure what to do?
I tried using sinθ = [itex]\frac{y}{(y^2+L^2)^{1/2}}[/itex], but then I get a complicated expression.
I know I need to obtain a -constant*y on the LHS. Any suggestions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think i got it, your assuming sinθ ≈ y/L, for small y.
One question though, do we have to assume gravity is negligible to get a sensible answer?
 
Last edited:
No, you don't. The differential equation becomes
$$y'' + \frac{2T}{mL}y + g=0.$$ Now consider a change of variables to ##u = y+\frac{mg}{2T}L##. What's the differential equation in terms of ##u##? What does ##\frac{mg}{2T}L## physically represent?
 
vela said:
No, you don't. The differential equation becomes
$$y'' + \frac{2T}{mL}y + g=0.$$ Now consider a change of variables to ##u = y+\frac{mg}{2T}L##. What's the differential equation in terms of ##u##? What does ##\frac{mg}{2T}L## physically represent?

We haven't studied differential equations in much depth (since its a introductory physics course), so I didn't really catch the change of variables part. If you could explain further, I'd appreciate it.
 
I would just throw gravity out. The problem doesn't specifically mention it, so it might as well be on a frictionless tabletop or so.
 
NATURE.M said:
We haven't studied differential equations in much depth (since its a introductory physics course), so I didn't really catch the change of variables part. If you could explain further, I'd appreciate it.
I'm saying rewrite the equation in terms of u instead of y. If you differentiate u twice, you get u''=y'', right? Just substitute in for y and y''.

jackarms said:
I would just throw gravity out. The problem doesn't specifically mention it, so it might as well be on a frictionless tabletop or so.
It would be kind of hard to oscillate vertically on a flat tabletop.
 
vela said:
It would be kind of hard to oscillate vertically on a flat tabletop.
When I read the problem, I also assumed (as jackarms did) that the oscillation was taking place in the horizontal, not the vertical. There is nothing in the problem statement that mentions the vertical. I pictured a horizontal frictionless table.

Chet
 
this is what I came out with...I also went on to show the frequency as well...
 

Attachments

  • shm.jpg
    shm.jpg
    18.6 KB · Views: 518
Ronaldo95163 said:
this is what I came out with...I also went on to show the frequency as well...
This is definitely not what my answer would have been. I would have had T as a parameter in the frequency. I would have had:
[tex]f=\frac{1}{2π}\sqrt{\frac{2T}{mL}}[/tex]
This is based on Vela's equation in post #3, with g removed.

Chet
 
  • #10
That's true. I inferred it from the use of ##y##, but that's not really justified.
 
  • #11
The angular frequency is actually represented by omega...f is the frequency of oscillation
 
  • #12
Ronaldo95163 said:
The angular frequency is actually represented by omega...f is the frequency of oscillation
Yes. ω=2πf

Chet
 
  • #13
Yip so my proof of the angular frequency stops at the third to last line
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K