Solving SHM of Cube Connected By Rubber Bands

  • Thread starter Thread starter NATURE.M
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cube Rubber Shm
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
12 replies · 3K views
NATURE.M
Messages
298
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A cube of mass m is connected to two rubber bands of length L, each under tension T. The cube is displaced by a small distance y perpendicular to the length of the rubber bands. Assume the tension doesn't change. Show that the system exhibits SHM, and find its angular freqency ω.

The Attempt at a Solution



So basically from a FBD of cube, I have vertical forces: -2Tsinθ - mg = m[itex]\frac{d^2y}{dt^2}[/itex] and the horizontal components of tension from each band cancels. Now since the cube is displaced by a small distance y, I assume we can approximate sinθ ≈ θ. But then I'm not sure what to do?
I tried using sinθ = [itex]\frac{y}{(y^2+L^2)^{1/2}}[/itex], but then I get a complicated expression.
I know I need to obtain a -constant*y on the LHS. Any suggestions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think i got it, your assuming sinθ ≈ y/L, for small y.
One question though, do we have to assume gravity is negligible to get a sensible answer?
 
Last edited:
No, you don't. The differential equation becomes
$$y'' + \frac{2T}{mL}y + g=0.$$ Now consider a change of variables to ##u = y+\frac{mg}{2T}L##. What's the differential equation in terms of ##u##? What does ##\frac{mg}{2T}L## physically represent?
 
vela said:
No, you don't. The differential equation becomes
$$y'' + \frac{2T}{mL}y + g=0.$$ Now consider a change of variables to ##u = y+\frac{mg}{2T}L##. What's the differential equation in terms of ##u##? What does ##\frac{mg}{2T}L## physically represent?

We haven't studied differential equations in much depth (since its a introductory physics course), so I didn't really catch the change of variables part. If you could explain further, I'd appreciate it.
 
I would just throw gravity out. The problem doesn't specifically mention it, so it might as well be on a frictionless tabletop or so.
 
NATURE.M said:
We haven't studied differential equations in much depth (since its a introductory physics course), so I didn't really catch the change of variables part. If you could explain further, I'd appreciate it.
I'm saying rewrite the equation in terms of u instead of y. If you differentiate u twice, you get u''=y'', right? Just substitute in for y and y''.

jackarms said:
I would just throw gravity out. The problem doesn't specifically mention it, so it might as well be on a frictionless tabletop or so.
It would be kind of hard to oscillate vertically on a flat tabletop.
 
vela said:
It would be kind of hard to oscillate vertically on a flat tabletop.
When I read the problem, I also assumed (as jackarms did) that the oscillation was taking place in the horizontal, not the vertical. There is nothing in the problem statement that mentions the vertical. I pictured a horizontal frictionless table.

Chet
 
this is what I came out with...I also went on to show the frequency as well...
 

Attachments

  • shm.jpg
    shm.jpg
    18.6 KB · Views: 532
Ronaldo95163 said:
this is what I came out with...I also went on to show the frequency as well...
This is definitely not what my answer would have been. I would have had T as a parameter in the frequency. I would have had:
[tex]f=\frac{1}{2π}\sqrt{\frac{2T}{mL}}[/tex]
This is based on Vela's equation in post #3, with g removed.

Chet
 
The angular frequency is actually represented by omega...f is the frequency of oscillation
 
Yip so my proof of the angular frequency stops at the third to last line