Solving Sinusoidal Diff EQ: Lagrangian Equation Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a second-order differential equation of the form \(\ddot{\Theta}=C \sin{\Theta}\), where \(\Theta\) is a function of time and \(C\) is a constant. The context is a Lagrangian mechanics problem, and participants are exploring methods to approach the solution without explicitly solving it.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss differentiating functions to relate to the sine term, with some noting that the equation can be expressed as \(\theta'' = f(\theta)\). There are mentions of using the chain rule and separation of variables as potential methods for solving the equation. Questions arise about the integration process and the nature of the resulting integrals, with some suggesting that the left-hand side may lead to an elliptic integral.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing insights and approaches. Some have provided guidance on using separation of variables, while others express uncertainty about the integration steps and the validity of certain assumptions. There is recognition of the complexity involved in integrating the resulting expressions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential for small angle approximations, indicating a consideration of the limitations of certain methods in specific scenarios. There is also an acknowledgment of the challenges posed by integrating the left-hand side of the equation.

SonOfOle
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[tex]\ddot{\Theta}=C \sin{\Theta}[/tex] where [tex]\Theta[/tex] is a function of time, and C is a constant.

I ran into this on a Lagrangian Equation problem, and though the problem doesn't ask for the solution, I'm wondering how one would solve this Diff EQ. I'm afraid my intro to Diff EQ class was a couple years back and I'm coming up short with any ideas.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what function do you differentiate twice to get a sin with a constant in front?
 
You can solve this by noting that the second order derivative of theta is purely a function of theta alone. This means that [tex]\theta'' = f(\theta)[/tex]

By the chain rule:

[tex]\frac{d^2 \theta}{dt^2} = \frac{d}{d\theta} \left( \frac{{\theta'}^2}{2} \right) = C \sin \theta[/tex]

This is separable and solvable. Once you have solved for [itex]\theta '[/itex], you can use solve for theta again using separation of variables
 
Defennder said:
You can solve this by noting that the second order derivative of theta is purely a function of theta alone. This means that [tex]\theta'' = f(\theta)[/tex]

By the chain rule:

[tex]\frac{d^2 \theta}{dt^2} = \frac{d}{d\theta} \left( \frac{{\theta'}^2}{2} \right) = C \sin \theta[/tex]

This is separable and solvable. Once you have solved for [itex]\theta '[/itex], you can use solve for theta again using separation of variables

Alright, so:

[tex]\frac{d^2 \theta}{dt^2} = \frac{d}{d\theta} \left( \frac{{\theta'}^2}{2} \right) = C \sin \theta[/tex]

[tex]\left( \frac{{\theta'}^2}{2} \right) = (C_{1} \cos \theta) + C_{2}[/tex]

[tex]\theta = \int \sqrt{(C_{1} \cos \theta)+C_{2}} dt[/tex]

How would I use separation of variables here?
 
By separating the variables before you integrate!
[tex]\theta '= \sqrt{2C cos(\theta)+ C_2}[/tex]
Where I have incorporated the "2C2[/sup]" into the unknown constant C2 (but not C1= 2C; C is a given number, not an unknown).

[tex]d\theta= \sqrt{2C cos(\theta)+ C_2}dt[/tex]
[tex]\int \frac{d\theta}{\sqrt{2C cos(\theta)+ C2}}= \int dt[/itex]<br /> <br /> That integral on the left looks to me like an "elliptic integral" which cannot be integrated in terms of elementary functions.[/tex]
 
That's not what you should get. You should have [tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{c_1 - 2 \cos \theta}} d\theta = dt[/tex]

But I see a problem here. I don't know of a way to integrate the LHS.
 
Thanks all. That helps. It's coming back, just slowly at times.
 
Of course, the traditional way to solve it is to make a small angle approximation, and forget about the cases where that isn't valid. :p
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K