Solving the Eigenvalue Problem: Proving \ e ^ A \psi=\ e ^\lambda\psi

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a relationship involving the exponential of a matrix and its eigenvalue. The original poster presents a problem where they need to show that if \( A \psi = \lambda \psi \), then \( e^A \psi = e^\lambda \psi \). The subject area is linear algebra, specifically focusing on eigenvalues and matrix exponentiation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to manipulate the equation using logarithmic properties, suggesting that if \( e^A \psi = e^\lambda \psi \) holds, then they can take the logarithm of both sides. Some participants question the validity of "cancelling" terms in the context of matrices, particularly regarding the logarithm of a matrix.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's reasoning, with some providing hints and questioning the assumptions made about matrix operations. There is a recognition of the complexity involved in dealing with matrix logarithms, and the discussion is exploring different interpretations of the mathematical properties at play.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the treatment of logarithms in the context of matrices, as well as the implications of cancelling terms in matrix equations. The original poster's approach is being scrutinized for its mathematical rigor.

neelakash
Messages
491
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Consider the following problem:

if [tex]\ A[/tex][tex]\psi=[/tex][tex]\lambda[/tex][tex]\psi[/tex],prove that

[tex]\ e ^ A[/tex][tex]\psi=[/tex][tex]\ e ^\lambda[/tex][tex]\psi[/tex]

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



This is my attempt.Please check if I am correct.

If
[tex]\ e ^ A[/tex][tex]\psi=[/tex][tex]\ e ^\lambda[/tex][tex]\psi[/tex]

is correct, we should have:

[tex]\ ln[/tex][tex]\ e^ A[/tex][tex]\psi=[/tex][tex]\ ln[/tex][tex]\ e ^\lambda[/tex][tex]\psi[/tex]

or, [tex]\ ln \{e^A} +[/tex][tex]\ ln \psi=[/tex][tex]\ ln \{e^\lambda} +[/tex][tex]\ ln \psi[/tex]

Now cancel [tex]\ ln \psi[/tex] from both sides and post-multiply the resulting equation by [tex]\psi[/tex]

That is---

[tex]\ ln \{e^A} =[/tex][tex]\ ln \{e^\lambda}[/tex]

or, [tex]\ [ln \{e ^ A}][/tex][tex]\psi=[/tex][tex]\ [ln \{e ^\lambda}][/tex][tex]\psi[/tex]

Alternatively,

[tex]\ A[/tex][tex]\psi=[/tex][tex]\lambda[/tex][tex]\psi[/tex]

So, we got the given equation from the equation to be proved.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The LaTeX image is not coming good.But I think everyone will understand my procedure.
 
neelakash said:
...
Now cancel [tex]\ ln \psi[/tex] from both sides and post-multiply the resulting equation by [tex]\psi[/tex] You cannot "cancel". [tex]\ln \psi[/tex] is a matrix.

Do you know the definition of the matrix [itex]e^A[/itex]?
 
I know the definition of e^A

Let A,B and C be three matrices.

If I have A+C=B+C

what is wrong if I cancel C from both sides?

ln (psi) is a matrix if you consider psi as matrix.I am usimg psi as a complex function like psi=M+iN
 
I did according to your hint.That works well, but still I am having problem to see why the logaritm of a matrix/operator will not work.
 
Also, your way of setting up the proof is flawed, as the following direct analogy shows

Theorem: If 1 = 1, prove that 0 = 1.

Proof:
If 0 = 1 is correct, then we obviously also have 1 = 0. Adding the two equations gives
Code:
0 = 1
1 = 0  + 
--------
1 = 1
which is the assumption given.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K