Solving the Eigenvalue Problem: Proving \ e ^ A \psi=\ e ^\lambda\psi

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 3K views
neelakash
Messages
491
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Consider the following problem:

if [tex]\ A[/tex][tex]\psi=[/tex][tex]\lambda[/tex][tex]\psi[/tex],prove that

[tex]\ e ^ A[/tex][tex]\psi=[/tex][tex]\ e ^\lambda[/tex][tex]\psi[/tex]

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



This is my attempt.Please check if I am correct.

If
[tex]\ e ^ A[/tex][tex]\psi=[/tex][tex]\ e ^\lambda[/tex][tex]\psi[/tex]

is correct, we should have:

[tex]\ ln[/tex][tex]\ e^ A[/tex][tex]\psi=[/tex][tex]\ ln[/tex][tex]\ e ^\lambda[/tex][tex]\psi[/tex]

or, [tex]\ ln \{e^A} +[/tex][tex]\ ln \psi=[/tex][tex]\ ln \{e^\lambda} +[/tex][tex]\ ln \psi[/tex]

Now cancel [tex]\ ln \psi[/tex] from both sides and post-multiply the resulting equation by [tex]\psi[/tex]

That is---

[tex]\ ln \{e^A} =[/tex][tex]\ ln \{e^\lambda}[/tex]

or, [tex]\ [ln \{e ^ A}][/tex][tex]\psi=[/tex][tex]\ [ln \{e ^\lambda}][/tex][tex]\psi[/tex]

Alternatively,

[tex]\ A[/tex][tex]\psi=[/tex][tex]\lambda[/tex][tex]\psi[/tex]

So, we got the given equation from the equation to be proved.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The LaTeX image is not coming good.But I think everyone will understand my procedure.
 
neelakash said:
...
Now cancel [tex]\ ln \psi[/tex] from both sides and post-multiply the resulting equation by [tex]\psi[/tex] You cannot "cancel". [tex]\ln \psi[/tex] is a matrix.

Do you know the definition of the matrix [itex]e^A[/itex]?
 
I know the definition of e^A

Let A,B and C be three matrices.

If I have A+C=B+C

what is wrong if I cancel C from both sides?

ln (psi) is a matrix if you consider psi as matrix.I am usimg psi as a complex function like psi=M+iN
 
I did according to your hint.That works well, but still I am having problem to see why the logaritm of a matrix/operator will not work.
 
Also, your way of setting up the proof is flawed, as the following direct analogy shows

Theorem: If 1 = 1, prove that 0 = 1.

Proof:
If 0 = 1 is correct, then we obviously also have 1 = 0. Adding the two equations gives
Code:
0 = 1
1 = 0  + 
--------
1 = 1
which is the assumption given.