MHB Solving the Matrix Transformation: $B \to C$

evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

Let $B=(b_1, b_2)$, $C=(c_1, c_2)$ basis of $\mathbb{R}^2$ and $L$ operator of $\mathbb{R}^2$, the matrix as for $B$ of which is $\begin{pmatrix}
2 & 2\\
1 & 0
\end{pmatrix}$. If $b_1=c_1+2c_2+b_2=c_1+3c_2$ and $A=\begin{pmatrix}
a_{11} & a_{12}\\
a_{21} & a_{22}
\end{pmatrix}$ the matrix of $L$ as for the basis $C$, what does the number $2a_{11}+3a_{12}+a_{21}+3a_{22}$ equal to? (Thinking)

In order to find the desired quantity, do we use the fact that the composition of C with $\begin{pmatrix}
2 & 2\\
1 & 0
\end{pmatrix}$ is equal to $A$ ? But how do we express the composition mathematically? We cannot multiply $C$ by the matrix, since the dimensions do not agree... (Worried)

Or am I somewhere wrong? (Thinking)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
Hello! (Wave)

Let $B=(b_1, b_2)$, $C=(c_1, c_2)$ basis of $\mathbb{R}^2$ and $L$ operator of $\mathbb{R}^2$, the matrix as for $B$ of which is $\begin{pmatrix}
2 & 2\\
1 & 0
\end{pmatrix}$. If $b_1=c_1+2c_2+b_2=c_1+3c_2$
Do you mean $b_1= c_1+ 3c_2$ and $b_2= c_1+ 3c_2$?

and $A=\begin{pmatrix}
a_{11} & a_{12}\\
a_{21} & a_{22}
\end{pmatrix}$ the matrix of $L$ as for the basis $C$, what does the number $2a_{11}+3a_{12}+a_{21}+3a_{22}$ equal to? (Thinking)

In order to find the desired quantity, do we use the fact that the composition of C with $\begin{pmatrix}
2 & 2\\
1 & 0
\end{pmatrix}$ is equal to $A$ ? But how do we express the composition mathematically? We cannot multiply $C$ by the matrix, since the dimensions do not agree... (Worried)

Or am I somewhere wrong? (Thinking)
Perhaps you are confused as to what $C$ is. C is the pair of 2-vectors $c_1$ and $c_2$ so we certainly can multiply each by the 2 by 2 matrix A. Or we can represent C itself as a 2 by 2 matrix with $c_1$ and $c_2$ as columns and multiply that matrix by A.

To write a linear operator in a given ordered basis, apply the linear operator to each base vector in turn and use the result (again written as a linear combination of the basis vectors) as columns.

So how do we apply A to $c_1$? From $b_1= c_1+ 2c_2$ and $b_2= c_1+ 3c_2$, subtracting eliminates $c_1$ and gives $c_2= b_2- b_1$. Then $b_1= c_1+ 2c_2= c_1+ 2(b_2- b_1)= c_1+ 2b_2- 2b_1$ so $c_1= b_1- 2b_2+ 2b_1= 3b_1- 2b_2$.

So $Ac_1= A(3b_1- 2b_2)= 3Ab_1- 2Ab_2$. But $Ab_1$ is just the first column of the matrix form for A in basis B: $Ab_1= \begin{pmatrix}2 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}$. Similarly, $Ab_2$ is the second column: $Ab_2= \begin{pmatrix}2 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}$. Then $Ac_1= 3\begin{pmatrix}2 \\ 1\end{pmatrix}- 2\begin{pmatrix}2 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix}2 \\ 3\end{pmatrix}$.

And $Ac_2= A(b_2- b_1)= Ab_2- Ab_1= \begin{pmatrix}2 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}- \begin{pmatrix}2 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix}0 \\ -1\end{pmatrix}$.

Finally, linear operator A, represented as a matrix in basis C, is the matrix having those vectors as columns:
$\begin{pmatrix}2 & 0 \\ 3 & -1 \end{pmatrix}$.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K