Solving the Olympic Ring Puzzle: Calculate Max Mass

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
87 replies · 11K views
No, that's not quite right. Rcosθ represents one of the sides of the blue triangle.
 

Attachments

  • blue triangle.jpg
    blue triangle.jpg
    7.8 KB · Views: 484
Physics news on Phys.org
mgcosθ + Fn = mv2/R

mgh = (1/2)mv2

2mgh = mv2

mgcosθ + Fn = 2mgh/R

but for the height, i have been searching in my notes and even online, maybe its just a remember thing, but i can't seem to do anything that would be equal to h.
 
haruspex said:
What height above the circle's centre does the bead start? How high is it above the circle's centre when it has moved angle theta around the circle? h is the difference of the two.

h = R - Rcosθ

Since R represents the radius
and Rcosθ is the side,
if we subtract the two the h is that right?
 
So this is what i get:

mgcosθ + Fn = 2mg (R -Rcosθ) / R
Rmgcosθ + RFn = 2mgR - 2mgRcosθ
RFn = 2mgR - 3Rmgcosθ
RFn = (R) 2mg - 3mgcosθ
Fn = 2mg - 3mgcosθ

tada!
 
SuperHero said:
So this is what i get:

mgcosθ + Fn = 2mg (R -Rcosθ) / R
Rmgcosθ + RFn = 2mgR - 2mgRcosθ
RFn = 2mgR - 3Rmgcosθ
RFn = (R) 2mg - 3mgcosθ
Fn = 2mg - 3mgcosθ

tada!

Good. So the forces on the ring are? And when you have that, at what angle theta is the tension minimised?
 
haruspex said:
Good. So the forces on the ring are? And when you have that, at what angle theta is the tension minimised?

So the forces on the big ring are the 2 normal forces by the beads and the force of gravity. For the θ, r u supposed to know or calculate?
 
SuperHero said:
So the forces on the big ring are the 2 normal forces by the beads and the force of gravity. For the θ, r u supposed to know or calculate?

We're not ready to determine theta yet. Just carry on using it as an unknown.
You missed out the tension. We're not ready to set that zero yet.
Write the equation for the vertical components of the forces.
 
Alright so for the vertical component of the ring we have

the two 2(Fn) towards the middle and the Fg as well as the tension so.

2(Fn = 2mg - 3mgcosθ) + T = Fg
 
Remember that the forces acting on the ring add together as vectors. So, you need to consider the vertical components separately from the horizontal components.
 
TSny said:
Remember that the forces acting on the ring add together as vectors. So, you need to consider the vertical components separately from the horizontal components.

ah, i see.
but doesn't me expression still go with your statement?
 
SuperHero said:
Alright so for the vertical component of the ring we have

the two 2(Fn) towards the middle
Careful with the direction of Fn. As a force on the bead, you took the positive direction to be towards the centre of the circle. We're now dealing with the reaction force of the bead on the ring, so the direction is reversed. (But I see you have done that in the equation below.)
and the Fg as well as the tension so.

2(Fn = 2mg - 3mgcosθ) + T = Fg

We only want the vertical component of each force. Fn is not vertical.
When you have corrected that, the next thing is to find out for what values of Fg the tension, T, becomes 0 at some point during the movement of the beads.
How do you think we might do that?
 
would that mean that the fg should be less than T, in order for it to go lose or become slack?
ok so if the Fn is not a vertical force. the equation would become T = Fg
 
haruspex said:
No, Fn is neither vertical nor horizontal. It has a vertical component. What is the magnitude of that vertical component?

it if Fncosθ
 
haruspex said:
Yes. So now write your equation with T, Fn, θ and Fg again.

2(Fncosθ) + T = Fg

like this?
since you pointed out this equation was correct earlier.
 
SuperHero said:
2(Fncosθ) + T = Fg
Yes, but substituting what you already worked out for Fn.
The next thing is to find out for what values of Fg the tension, T, becomes 0 at some point during the movement of the beads.
How do you think we might do that?
 
haruspex said:
Yes, but substituting what you already worked out for Fn.
The next thing is to find out for what values of Fg the tension, T, becomes 0 at some point during the movement of the beads.
How do you think we might do that?

So wouldn't the tension have to be the same as the gravity Fg force
 
SuperHero said:
So wouldn't the tension have to be the same as the gravity Fg force
No! You have your equation: T = Fg - 2Fncos(θ) = Fg - 2mg(2-3cos(θ))cos(θ). Do you get that? It really bothers me that having come this far you would suggest T = Fg.

Let's look at some values here. When θ = 0, T = Fg+2mg (correct). When θ = π/2, T = Fg (correct). When θ > π/2, T > Fg. But perhaps somewhere between 0 and π/2, T < Fg. How might we find the most interesting value of θ?
 
haruspex said:
No! You have your equation: T = Fg - 2Fncos(θ) = Fg - 2mg(2-3cos(θ))cos(θ). Do you get that? It really bothers me that having come this far you would suggest T = Fg.

Let's look at some values here. When θ = 0, T = Fg+2mg (correct). When θ = π/2, T = Fg (correct). When θ > π/2, T > Fg. But perhaps somewhere between 0 and π/2, T < Fg. How might we find the most interesting value of θ?

would it be that θ<π/2 would make, T < Fg, so couldn't it be 45°
 
It could be, or it could be something else. We want to know whether T can reach zero, right? And in particular we want to know the largest Fg for which T can reach zero. So of all the values of 2mg(2-3cos(θ))cos(θ), which one are we looking for?
 
haruspex said:
It could be, or it could be something else. We want to know whether T can reach zero, right? And in particular we want to know the largest Fg for which T can reach zero. So of all the values of 2mg(2-3cos(θ))cos(θ), which one are we looking for?

The Fg of the ring? which includes the ring and the beads
 
SuperHero said:
The Fg of the ring? which includes the ring and the beads
Not sure what you intended Fg to include, but based on the equations it is only the weight of the ring. That's how it should be. Any contribution from the beads comes in via Fn.

So, to recap, we have T = Fg - 2mg(2-3cos(θ))cos(θ), and we want to know the largest Fg for which T goes as low as 0 for some theta. We can turn that around and ask what's the lowest T for a given Fg? I.e. for a given Fg, what value of theta will make T go lowest?
 
haruspex said:
Not sure what you intended Fg to include, but based on the equations it is only the weight of the ring. That's how it should be. Any contribution from the beads comes in via Fn.

So, to recap, we have T = Fg - 2mg(2-3cos(θ))cos(θ), and we want to know the largest Fg for which T goes as low as 0 for some theta. We can turn that around and ask what's the lowest T for a given Fg? I.e. for a given Fg, what value of theta will make T go lowest?

Well the Fg has to be a bit bigger than T, so the value of theta has to be atleast 1 to be allow the tension to be smaller than fg right?
 
SuperHero said:
Well the Fg has to be a bit bigger than T, so the value of theta has to be atleast 1 to be allow the tension to be smaller than fg right?
Theta has to be at least 1 what? Radian? How do you work that out? Never mind.
Concentrate on this: given the equation T = Fg - 2mg(2-3cos(θ))cos(θ), where Fg is fixed, how do we find the value of θ that produces the smallest value for T? (Think calculus.)
 
I have calculus next semester though