Solving the Sky Hook (Beanstalk) Equation - 65 Characters

  • Thread starter Thread starter Feynmanfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sky
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physics of a hypothetical cable, referred to as the "sky hook," that extends vertically from the Equator. Participants analyze the forces acting on the cable, specifically the gravitational force and centrifugal acceleration, leading to the equation mw²(R+L/2) = GMm/(R(R+L)). A critical point raised is the tension within the cable, which integrates out to zero at both ends, as there are no external forces acting on the free ends. The conclusion emphasizes the need to consider the tension gradient and the balance of forces to determine the cable's length accurately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational force and centrifugal acceleration
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Knowledge of Newton's laws of motion, particularly tension and internal forces
  • Basic concepts of rotational dynamics and frame of reference
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of tension in cables under varying forces
  • Study the principles of rotational dynamics in non-inertial frames
  • Investigate materials capable of withstanding high tensile stress
  • Learn about gravitational effects on structures in rotating systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineering students, and anyone interested in advanced mechanics and the theoretical implications of forces in rotating systems.

Feynmanfan
Messages
128
Reaction score
0
Dear friends,

<<A cable of constant mass per unit length (p) points straight up hovering over a point on the Equator. How long has to be the cable?>>

I believe there's a mistake in my answer and I need somebody to give me a hint. What I've done is: integrate dF(gravitational force) over the whole string of length L. So the net force equals the centrifugal acceleration times mass, in the centre of mass. Doesn't it?

so i get mw^2(R+L/2)=GMm/(R(R+L)) where R is the Earth radius and w it's angular velocity.

A friend of mine has told me that I'm missing the stress (tension) in this answer. Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Feynmanfan said:
Dear friends,

<<A cable of constant mass per unit length (p) points straight up hovering over a point on the Equator. How long has to be the cable?>>

I believe there's a mistake in my answer and I need somebody to give me a hint. What I've done is: integrate dF(gravitational force) over the whole string of length L. So the net force equals the centrifugal acceleration times mass, in the centre of mass. Doesn't it?

so i get mw^2(R+L/2)=GMm/(R(R+L)) where R is the Earth radius and w it's angular velocity.

A friend of mine has told me that I'm missing the stress (tension) in this answer. Thanks for your help.

There is tension that holds the string together, but the tension is internal force and when you integrate the length of the string the tension integrates out. You can break the problem down to look at the force acting on an infinitesimal length of the string, including the tension gradient for each infinitesimal length, then integrate over the length

<br /> \int_R^{R + L} {\frac{{GM\rho dr}}{{r^2 }}} - \int_R^{R + L} {\frac{{dT(r)dr}}{{dr}}} = \int_R^{R + L} \rho \omega ^2 rdr} } <br />

The second inegral results in the tension difference between the two ends, which is zero since both ends have zero tension. That leaves the first and last integrals equal and gives your result, to be solved for L
 
Feynmanfan said:
Dear friends,

<<A cable of constant mass per unit length (p) points straight up hovering over a point on the Equator. How long has to be the cable?>>

I believe there's a mistake in my answer and I need somebody to give me a hint. What I've done is: integrate dF(gravitational force) over the whole string of length L. So the net force equals the centrifugal acceleration times mass, in the centre of mass. Doesn't it?

so i get mw^2(R+L/2)=GMm/(R(R+L)) where R is the Earth radius and w it's angular velocity.

A friend of mine has told me that I'm missing the stress (tension) in this answer. Thanks for your help.
I am having a little difficulty understanding the problem. What makes the cable stand straight up? What is it connected to? What is holding the fixed end and where is the fixed end?

AM
 
This is the infamous "sky hook". Look at the cable from the frame of the rotating earth. A segment of cable at the bottom has greater weight than centrifugal force, but at the top the centrifugal force is greater than the weight. The idea is that if the cable is long (and strong) enough, the centrifugal force will be enough to support the entire weight of the cable.

So... it's not connect to anything and nothing external is holding it up!

Given those assumptions, I'd say that Feynmanfan got it right. As OlderDan points out, the tension is just an internal force.

Interesting problem.
 
Thanks a lot for your kind answer. Once that I've determined the length of the cable, I'll try to find a material strong enough to withstand the maximum tensile stress.

Let's see if I get it right.
 
Good Luck! You might want to write Arthur Clarke for advice.
 
Sorry to bother you again with this thread, but I don't know how to justify that the tension is zero on the ends. Could you give me a good physical reason?
 
To have tension in a segment of rope requires a force be exerted at each end of that segment. But at the free end of a rope, there's nothing to exert a force.

Another way to look at it: Imagine an infinitesimal slice of rope at the very end. If there were anything other than an infinitesimally small tension pulling the rope slice, it would accelerate. Thus the tension must be zero at the ends.
 
Doc Al said:
To have tension in a segment of rope requires a force be exerted at each end of that segment. But at the free end of a rope, there's nothing to exert a force.

Another way to look at it: Imagine an infinitesimal slice of rope at the very end. If there were anything other than an infinitesimally small tension pulling the rope slice, it would accelerate. Thus the tension must be zero at the ends.
Is the end not accelerating? Will there not be differential gravitational (tidal) forces that will tend to stretch the cable?

AM
 
  • #10
Andrew Mason said:
Is the end not accelerating? Will there not be differential gravitational (tidal) forces that will tend to stretch the cable?
I don't think I made my point very clearly. Viewed from the rotating frame of the earth, there is no acceleration. For a tiny slice at the end of the cable, the forces (weight and centrifugal) tend to zero. If the tension at the ends did not also go to zero, there would be a problem.

Yes, the forces will tend to stretch the cable, so there will be tension throughout the cable, but the tension at the ends will be zero. (Correct me if I'm wrong.)
 
  • #11
Doc Al said:
I don't think I made my point very clearly. Viewed from the rotating frame of the earth, there is no acceleration. For a tiny slice at the end of the cable, the forces (weight and centrifugal) tend to zero. If the tension at the ends did not also go to zero, there would be a problem.

Yes, the forces will tend to stretch the cable, so there will be tension throughout the cable, but the tension at the ends will be zero. (Correct me if I'm wrong.)

You're not wrong about the tension. There can be no tension at the free end of a rope. Newton's third law tells us that. There has to be a reaction force for there to be a force. There could be other forces like the electric force on a charged rope with an excess charge at the surface in an electric field or some such thing.

At the upper end, the weight and the centrifugal force do tend to zero, but their ratio would have to converge to a finite value. For that last bit of mass dm there has to be a tension on the lower side that exceeds the weight by the necessary centripetal force to keep that bit of mass moving in a circle. That does not change the fact that on the other side of dm there is nothing to pull it, so the tension goes to zero.

I didn't try to calculate it, but I expect the tension in the middle region of this thing to be enormous.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K