Solving Wave Equation with Paraxial Approximation

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
on Phys.org
If [itex]U_0(r,z)=V(r,z)e^{ikz}[/itex], then:

[tex]\frac{\partial U_0}{\partial z}=\frac{\partial V}{\partial z}e^{ikz}+ikVe^{ikz}[/tex]

due to the product rule.

so... [tex]\frac{\partial^2 U_0}{\partial z^2}=\ldots[/tex]? :wink:
 
Oops, I see now I was looking past the obvious. I'll do the calculation in the morning. Is there a reason why they leave out the [tex]e^{ikz}[/tex] from the final equation?

Thanks.

edit: [tex]V = V(r,z)e^{ikz}[/tex]?
 
Last edited:
Confundo said:
Oops, I see now I was looking past the obvious. I'll do the calculation in the morning. Is there a reason why they leave out the [tex]e^{ikz}[/tex] from the final equation?

They haven't "left it out"...To see what becomes of that term, work out the derivatives in equation (4) using the assumed form of U_0.


edit: [tex]V = V(r,z)e^{ikz}[/tex]?

Huh?! :confused:...What are you trying to ask here?
 
Worked that out now, must learn not to try and do derivatives in my head while tired.