Solving Wave Interference: A Study of Frequency & Amplitude

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving wave interference problems by analyzing two waves defined as ARe(ei(kx-wt-d)) and A'Re(ei(kx-wt+d')). The objective is to find a second wave of the same frequency that results in zero amplitude at specific points, x = 0 and x = L. The participant, Juan, correctly identifies the need to set up equations based on the conditions for cancellation at these points, leading to a discussion on the frequencies that allow for such interference patterns.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave equations and complex exponentials
  • Knowledge of frequency and amplitude in wave mechanics
  • Familiarity with boundary conditions in physics
  • Basic skills in solving algebraic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the concept of standing waves and their properties
  • Study the mathematical techniques for solving wave equations
  • Research boundary value problems in wave mechanics
  • Learn about Fourier series and their application in wave analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those studying wave mechanics, as well as researchers interested in wave interference and standing wave phenomena.

JuanYsimura
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Write a wave in one space dimension as ARe(ei(kx-wt-d))where A is the
amplitude of the wave. Find a second wave of the same frequency such that
the sum of the two vanishes at x = 0 and x = L. Assuming the wave velocity
c = w/|k| is fixed, for what frequencies ! is this possible?



The Attempt at a Solution



My attempt: I Let x1 = ARe(ei(kx-wt+d)) be wave 1 and x2 = A'Re(ei(kx-wt+d')) be wave 2.
since they vanish at x=0,L, I obtained the following equations:
ARe(ei(-wt+d))+A'Re(ei(-wt+d)) = 0 and ARe(ei(Lk-wt+d))+A'Re(ei(Lk-wt+d)) = 0.
My question is: should I solve this equations and find the frequencies that satisfy this equation ?? Am I in the right path to solve the problems? Id Like to hear different opinions and different approaches.

Thanks,

Juan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't we want a standing wave where at least one pair of nodes is at 0 and L?

See,
 

Attachments

  • wave033.jpg
    wave033.jpg
    11.6 KB · Views: 473

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K