Solving Work Done Problems in Physics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion clarifies the concept of work in physics, specifically addressing scenarios involving lifting objects and applying force without movement. When lifting a 3.0N water bottle 3.0m and returning it to its original position, the total work done is zero due to equal and opposite forces acting during ascent and descent. Additionally, when two individuals push against an immobile wall, neither accomplishes work, despite potential differences in energy expenditure. The key takeaway is that work is defined by the movement of the point of application of force, not merely the exertion of energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, including force and work.
  • Familiarity with the definitions of conservative forces.
  • Knowledge of Newton's laws of motion.
  • Ability to analyze scenarios involving energy transfer and mechanical work.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of conservative and non-conservative forces in physics.
  • Learn about the work-energy theorem and its applications.
  • Explore the concept of kinetic energy and its relationship to work done.
  • Investigate real-world applications of work in mechanical systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying college-level physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of work and energy in physical systems.

Friache
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm having some trouble wrapping my head around a couple work concepts. I've been reading the following thread: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/displacement-and-work.322461/
and I don't think I've fully grasped how work is accomplished. My first question is if I lifted a (w=3.0N) water bottle 3.0m vertically and the returned it to its original position, has work been done? I realize that work is done from lifting and lowering it down, but once it returns to its origin does it matter?
The second is if two people press against a wall and person A gives up twice as person B then have persons A and B accomplished any work? And if so then has person B accomplished more for pushing longer? I realize that straining your muscles in any way requires energy, especially for long periods of time, but in a physics sense (We're talking college physics I) does it matter?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A necessary (but not sufficient) condition is that work is done when the point of application of the force is moved(not necessarily in the same direction as that of the force). So

A) Work is done by the force of your hand and by the weight of the bottle during the ascend (because the point of application of these forces which we consider to be the center of mass of the bottle, is moving) . But, assuming that the bottle is moving with constant velocity, this means that the force of your hand cancels the force of weight, therefore it is somewhat easy to prove that the work by force of hand is equal and opposite of the work of the weight. So the total work done for the ascend is zero during the ascend, though the weight and the hand force have done equal but opposite work (lets say that the work of the hand is positive and the work of the weight is negative during the ascend). So W_{hand}+W_{weight}=0(1).Similarly during the descent and assuming that the bottles also moves with constant velocity we conclude that the total work done is also zero, but this time the work of weight will be positive and the work of the hand will be negative. So W'_{hand}+W'_{weight}=0 (2).Now what also comes into play is that the force of weight is a conservative force which means that the work done by the weight in any closed trajectory(closed means that the start and end points coincide) is zero, no matter what the trajectory is. So it will be W_{weight}+W'_{weight}=0 and from this in conjuction with (1) and (2)we can conclude that W_{hand}+W'_{hand}=0. So we see that the total work of weight, and the total work of the hand are each zero, though the forces have done work during the ascend , or during the descent, but it is equal and opposite.

B) Since the point of application is not moved (we consider the wall to be immobile) the work done by A is zero, and also the work done by B is zero. Person B might be more tired but that's because when we apply a force (regardless if the point of application is moved or not) we strain our muscles therefore we consume energy but this energy doesn't necessarily go as kinetic energy of the object we aplly the force to.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Friache
Delta² said:
A necessary (but not sufficient) condition is that work is done when the point of application of the force is moved(not necessarily in the same direction as that of the force). So

A) Work is done by the force of your hand and by the weight of the bottle during the ascend (because the point of application of these forces which we consider to be the center of mass of the bottle, is moving) . But, assuming that the bottle is moving with constant velocity, this means that the force of your hand cancels the force of weight, therefore it is somewhat easy to prove that the work by force of hand is equal and opposite of the work of the weight. So the total work done for the ascend is zero during the ascend, though the weight and the hand force have done equal but opposite work (lets say that the work of the hand is positive and the work of the weight is negative during the ascend). So W_{hand}+W_{weight}=0(1).Similarly during the descent and assuming that the bottles also moves with constant velocity we conclude that the total work done is also zero, but this time the work of weight will be positive and the work of the hand will be negative. So W'_{hand}+W'_{weight}=0 (2).Now what also comes into play is that the force of weight is a conservative force which means that the work done by the weight in any closed trajectory(closed means that the start and end points coincide) is zero, no matter what the trajectory is. So it will be W_{weight}+W'_{weight}=0 and from this in conjuction with (1) and (2)we can conclude that W_{hand}+W'_{hand}=0. So we see that the total work of weight, and the total work of the hand are each zero, though the forces have done work during the ascend , or during the descent, but it is equal and opposite.

B) Since the point of application is not moved (we consider the wall to be immobile) the work done by A is zero, and also the work done by B is zero. Person B might be more tired but that's because when we apply a force (regardless if the point of application is moved or not) we strain our muscles therefore we consume energy but this energy doesn't necessarily go as kinetic energy of the object we aplly the force to.
Thanks for taking the time to go in detail about this. Its been driving me insane.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K