Solving Work, Energy & Friction for Block Movement & Spring Compression

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving work, energy, and friction related to a block moving down an incline and compressing a spring. The scenario includes a block of mass 2kg on a 53-degree incline, a spring with a spring constant of 70 N/m, and a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.36.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between gravitational potential energy, kinetic energy, and work done against friction. They discuss different methods to calculate the speed of the block upon hitting the spring and the subsequent compression of the spring.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing various approaches to the problem. Some suggest using gravitational potential energy and work done against friction, while others propose skipping kinetic energy in favor of a direct approach from the initial to final position. There is recognition of potential errors in dimensional analysis and sign conventions in the equations presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of including gravitational effects after the block hits the spring and question the correctness of the terms used in the equations, particularly regarding the work done by friction.

joex444
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Just need a simple logic check here. Let's say a block of 2kg is positioned on an incline of 53 degrees. 4m from the block is a spring with a k=70N/m. the coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.36. How fast is the block moving when it hits the spring? How far is the spring compressed.

Ok, so find the height from the block to the spring (this is <4m), and say Ugrav = Wfriction + KE, to answer the first part. Then, that KE = Uspring + Wfriction to find the compression. Now, Wfriction would be Ff(x), where x is the compression of the spring. Yes? Or, would KE = Uspring be the correct way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
joex444 said:
Ok, so find the height from the block to the spring (this is <4m), and say Ugrav = Wfriction + KE, to answer the first part.
Sounds good.

Then, that KE = Uspring + Wfriction to find the compression. Now, Wfriction would be Ff(x), where x is the compression of the spring. Yes? Or, would KE = Uspring be the correct way?
When solving for the compression, include the work done against friction. But don't forget the change in gravitational PE.
 
you may want to try solving the second part of this problem by skipping the kinetic energy- going directly from its original position to the final position. So, if x were the distance that the spring were compressed:

[tex]U + W_f = EPE[/tex]
[tex]mg(h+x) + W_f = 0.5kx^2[/tex]
 
Hmm...forgot about gravity after it hits the spring. Ok, so (H and X are the distance on the inclined plane, so I really want Hx and Xx in Ugrav)...
[tex]mg(h+x)\sin\theta + \mu mg\sin\theta = \frac{1}{2} kx^2[/tex]
and I know m, g, h, theta, mu, and k, so 1 variable left x. I ended up with a quadratic, once I put numbers into it: [tex]0=35x^2-15.65x-21.28[/tex] so x=1.03m. The question did say it was a "long" spring. I forgot gravity on the 2nd part on the final, so I ended up with an answer of 0.802m...
 
Wait; check the work by(or against) friction. The term does not appear dimensionally correct.
 
joex444 said:
Hmm...forgot about gravity after it hits the spring. Ok, so (H and X are the distance on the inclined plane, so I really want Hx and Xx in Ugrav)...
[tex]mg(h+x)\sin\theta + \mu mg\sin\theta = \frac{1}{2} kx^2[/tex]
Several problems with the 2nd term (the work done by friction):
(1) As mukundpa points out, it is dimensionally incorrect. (You forgot the distance.)
(2) The sign is incorrect.
(3) The sine is incorrect.
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
Replies
61
Views
4K