Solving x"+(1/x^2)=0: Finding k,a,B

  • Thread starter Thread starter fredrick08
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the differential equation x" + (1/x^2) = 0, specifically under the conditions x = c1 > 0 and x' = c2 at t = 0. Participants emphasize the need to clarify the relationship between c1 and c2 to derive a solution in the form of k(t + B)^a. The conversation highlights the importance of rewriting the equation as x^2 x" = -x and suggests that c1 may equal c2 to facilitate solving the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second-order differential equations
  • Familiarity with the method of substitution in differential equations
  • Knowledge of power series solutions
  • Basic calculus concepts, including derivatives and integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of solving second-order linear differential equations
  • Research the application of substitution techniques in differential equations
  • Explore power series solutions for differential equations
  • Learn about the implications of initial conditions on differential equation solutions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone involved in solving differential equations, particularly those interested in advanced calculus and mathematical modeling.

fredrick08
Messages
374
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


x"=(-1/x^2) when x=c1>0 and x'=c2 at t=0 what relationship has to exist between c1 and c2 to give the problem a solution of k(t+B)^a... then solve for k,a,B...




The Attempt at a Solution


x"+(1/x^2)=0, I am sorry I am just stuck, i think it goin to look somthin like (x+2)^2... but this inverse square is confusing me... we normally do it like,

[tex]\lambda[/tex]"+a[tex]\lambda[/tex]=0, but I am not sure, can anyone please point me in the right direction... but then wat does it mean by what relationship between c1and c2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first thing you need to do is state the problem clearly. " x"= -1/x2 when x= c1> 0" only gives x" at a single value of x. Did you mean "for x> c1"?

Rewrite the equation as x2x"= -x and see what happens when you replace x with k(t+B)a.
 
na that's wat the question says... its definitely x=c1>0... huh i can't write it like that coz then it would be (x^2)x"=-1 not -x... wel doesn't that mean that c1=c2?
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K