Solving x in 3.4^2x + 3 = 8.5: (-0.626)

  • Thread starter Thread starter brenfox
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the equation (3.4)^(2x+3) = 8.5 for x, resulting in x = -0.626. The solution involves dividing both sides by 3.4^3 and applying logarithmic properties. Participants clarified the correct notation and emphasized the importance of using parentheses to avoid confusion in mathematical expressions. The final solution was verified by substituting x back into the original equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of logarithmic functions and properties
  • Familiarity with exponentiation and its notation
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
  • Knowledge of solving equations involving variables in exponents
NEXT STEPS
  • Study logarithmic identities and their applications in solving equations
  • Practice solving exponential equations with different bases
  • Learn about the importance of notation in mathematical expressions
  • Explore advanced algebra techniques for manipulating complex equations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying algebra, educators teaching mathematical concepts, and anyone looking to improve their skills in solving exponential equations.

brenfox
Messages
71
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


(3.4)^2x+3 = 8.5. Solve for x

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


3.4^2x = 8.5/3.4^3 ( divide the equation by 3.4^3. This bit i am not sure about)

2xlog3.4 = log (8.5/3.4^3

x = log (8.5)- 3log(3.4) / 2 log (3.4)

=0.929-1.594/1.063
x = -0.626

This seems to work out when i plug it into the original equation.
Is there an insert equation icon on the template. Can`t find it!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you meant to say:

(3.4)^(2x+3) = 8.5. Solve for x.

Right? If not you need to edit your post to fix it.

What do you mean by "an insert equation icon"?
 
Looked at the question again and I have wrote it correctly. 3.4 is in parentheses. Not sure why this is so.

An equation icon makes my equations look neater if you know what I mean!
 
brenfox said:
Looked at the question again and I have wrote it correctly.
Are you saying that the original looks exactly like that, using the caret symbol instead of a superscript? Seems unlikely, so what you have posted is probably a rendition. But what you posted is equivalent to 3.42x+3. If you meant 3.42x+3 then you can write it as 3.4^(2x+3). And I feel it is a little simpler to take logs first then solve 2x+3 = log(8.5)/log(3.4).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu
Apologies jedishrfu, I have wrote it down wrong. Thanks haruspex, I should have used parentheses after the caret symbol. You live and learn!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K