Some confusion regarding yet another Coulumb's Law problem.

  • Thread starter Thread starter frankfjf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion Law
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a Coulomb's Law problem involving two charged particles, q1 = +3.0 microCoulombs and q2 = -4.0 microCoulombs, located at specified coordinates in the xy plane. Participants clarify that the electrostatic force on particle 2 due to particle 1 can be calculated using Coulomb's Law, specifically the formula kq1q2/r^2, where r is the distance calculated using the distance formula √((x1 - x2)² + (y1 - y2)²). For parts (c) and (d), the net force on a third particle q3 = +4.0 microCoulombs must equal zero, necessitating the setup of equations based on the forces exerted by particles 1 and 2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Coulomb's Law (kq1q2/r^2)
  • Distance formula (√((x1 - x2)² + (y1 - y2)²))
  • Vector decomposition of forces
  • Basic principles of electrostatics
NEXT STEPS
  • Calculate the electrostatic force using Coulomb's Law for given charges and coordinates.
  • Learn how to decompose forces into x and y components for multiple charged particles.
  • Explore equilibrium conditions for charged particles in electrostatics.
  • Study the implications of net forces equaling zero in electrostatic systems.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electrostatics, physics educators, and anyone seeking to understand the application of Coulomb's Law in multi-particle systems.

frankfjf
Messages
166
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The charges and coordinates of two charged particles held fixed in an xy plane are q1 = +3.0 microCoulombs, x1 = 3.5cm, y1 = 0.50cm, and q2 = -4.0 microCoulombs, x2 = 2.0cm, y2 = 1.5cm. Find the (a) magnitude and (b) direction of the electrostatic force on particle 2 due to particle 1. At what (c) x and (d) y coordinates should a third particle of charge q3 = +4.0 microCoulombs be placed such that the net electrostatic force on particle 3 due to particles 1 and 2 is zero?

Homework Equations



Herein lies the problem. Other than kq1q2/r^2 (Coulomb's Law), I'm not sure how to approach this.

The Attempt at a Solution



I've tried the method I remember from previous Physics, which is to add x1 + x2 for a net X and y1 + y2 for a net Y, then taking the square root of Xnet^2 + Ynet^2 for the magnitude, and the arctangent of Ynet over Xnet for the angle, which get me some answers, but I'm not sure if this is the proper method to use for parts a and b. I am also unclear on how to even begin parts c and d other than the observation that F31 + F32 must equal zero. Any help or hints at how to get started would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If would be much more helpful if you could elaborate on what you've done. How did you set up your equations? What answers did you get? I'm going to guess that you've got the right idea, about breaking up the forces into the x and y components.
 
No. You can't just add x1 and x2. The r^2 refers to the magnitude of the distance between them, do you know the distance formula? \sqrt{(x_1-x_2)^2+(y_1-y_2)^2}. That is r.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
9K