Some probabilities in card game

  • Thread starter Thread starter bigwuying
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Game Probabilities
AI Thread Summary
In a card game scenario, players win $3 if the second card dealt is a club and lose $1 if the second card is not a club while the first card is not an ace. The calculations involve determining probabilities for different outcomes, leading to a mean value of winnings per game of approximately 5.8 cents. Discussions reveal confusion over the correct reasoning for calculating these probabilities, with some participants arriving at slightly different figures. There is debate over the validity of the reasoning provided by a teaching assistant, with suggestions to clarify the methodology. Overall, the main focus is on accurately computing expected values based on card probabilities.
bigwuying
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
\sumThe question is:
You are involove in a game where two card are dealt consectively. Supposethat the dealer pays you $3of the second card dealt is a club, regardless of the first card and that you pay him $1 if the second card in not a club and the first card is not an ace. (othewise, no money changes hands.) Use \sumf_{i}p_{i} to compute the mean value of the money you win per game if you play it many time.

The ans is 5.8cent

I have spent a lot of time on that, but i still don't understand.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
List all different cases and probabilities

Second card a club - p1=1/4

Second card not a club and not an ace 36/52, first card not an ace 47/51
P2=9x47/(13x51)

Second card not a club and an ace 3/52, first card not an ace 48/51
p3=3x16/(52x17)

payoff= 3p1 - (p2+p3)

I got 5.76 cents.
 
Thanks for answering me!
The following is wrong reasoning,but i still can caculate the answers

second card a club- p1=1/4

First card not a club and not an ace 36/52, second card not a club 38/51
p2=(36X38)/(51X52)

First card is a club and not an ace 12/52 , second card not a club 39/51
p3=12x52/(39/51)

mean = 3p1-(p2+p3) =5.77

My course TA told me it was wrong reasoning, frustrate me a lot.
 
Off hand I would say your TA is wrong.
 
I get the same answer, .0576(9) taking the first card first, and the second card dependent. Perhaps the TA didn't understand the ordering you used?
 
I can't read your TA's mind. Why don't you ask him (or her)?
 
I think you've confused me with the OP, mathman. No problem.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top