Some questions on Special and Newtonian Relativity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion addresses two questions related to Special and Newtonian Relativity. The first question confirms that Ohm's Law (V = IR) is invariant under Galilean transformations, as demonstrated through the invariance of current density (j) and electric field (E) in both reference frames. The second question seeks guidance on modeling the Earth as an ellipsoid or spheroid to derive corrections to the inverse square law, indicating a need for further clarification on gravitational modeling techniques.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Ohm's Law (V = IR) and its application in electrical circuits
  • Familiarity with Galilean transformations and their implications in classical mechanics
  • Basic knowledge of gravitational laws and modeling techniques for celestial bodies
  • Concept of Lorentz transformations and their relationship to classical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Galilean transformations on electrical laws in classical physics
  • Study gravitational modeling techniques for ellipsoidal and spheroidal bodies
  • Explore the derivation of corrections to the inverse square law in gravitational physics
  • Investigate the concept of Lorentz invariance in relation to material properties like resistivity and conductivity
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and researchers in classical mechanics and gravitational physics who are looking to deepen their understanding of the interplay between electrical laws and relativistic transformations.

maverick280857
Messages
1,774
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement



Question 1: Is Ohm's Law (V = IR) invariant under Galilean transformations?
Question 2: Model the Earth as an ellipsoid or a spheroid, and find the lowest order correction to the inverse square law at points inside and outside the Earth's surface.

Homework Equations



--

The Attempt at a Solution



Question 1: Using the low velocity regime of the Lorentz transformations, we see that j = j', E = E' and so

[tex]j = \sigma E[/itex]<br /> <br /> is invariant in both reference frames. As lengths are invariant under a Galilean transformation, this is equivalent to V = IR in all inertial frames. Is this correct?<br /> <br /> Can this be argued <i>without</i> using the Lorentz transformations, i.e. without treating Galilean transformations as a special case of the Lorentz transformation for [itex]v << c[/itex]?<br /> <br /> (Also, can resistivity or conductivity be regarded as a Lorentz invariant scalar?)<br /> <br /> <b>Question 2</b>: This has me stumped right now...I don't understand what has to be done here. I would appreciate if someone could point me in the right direction.[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
maverick280857 said:
Question 2: This has me stumped right now...I don't understand what has to be done here. I would appreciate if someone could point me in the right direction.

Anyone?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K