Someone please explain why/how unit vectors help in vector calculations?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the role of unit vectors in vector calculations, exploring their benefits and implications in various coordinate systems.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster questions the necessity of unit vectors in calculations, seeking clarity on their simplification benefits. Some participants provide examples and emphasize the importance of recognizing vectors as linear combinations of basis vectors. Others discuss the implications of notation and coordinate systems.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original question, offering insights into the conceptual understanding of unit vectors and their notation. There is a recognition of the potential confusion arising from different coordinate systems and the notation used.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the challenges posed by varying coordinate systems and the importance of clear notation in understanding vector representations.

mujadeo
Messages
103
Reaction score
0
What is the benefit of using unit vectors rather than not using them??
I am not seeing the point of them? It seems to me that you can do the same calcs without adding the ihat and jhat.

Can someone explain exacly how and why unit vectors make vector calcs easier, or why we need them. Thanks

I do understand what a unit vector is, but i don't understand how they simplify calculations??:confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by "simplify calculations"? Can you give an example of what you are talking about please? Remember that, when writing a vector as (a,b,c) you are using unit vectors, just not saying so, since this is equal to ai+bj+ck
 
The only advantage to explicitly writing the i, j, and k vectors is that it firmly impresses upon the student that all vectors are a linear combination of some set of basis vectors, and that remains true even when you manipulate them. That's the only reason.

Using notation like (1, 2, 3) \cdot (4, 5, 6) is much more compact, but it can lull students into thinking that they're just playing games with numbers, when in fact they are doing geometry with vectors.

- Warren
 
And, of course there's the other benefit that writing them explicitly tells you what basis vectors you're using. If you just write the ordered triple (1,0,pi), are you thinking in terms of Cartesian coordinates, cylindrical coordinates, spherical coordinates, or something else?

(My vector calculus book had a nasty habit of always writing things in terms of ordered triples, even when using non-Cartesian bases. It could be a pain.)
 
Manchot said:
And, of course there's the other benefit that writing them explicitly tells you what basis vectors you're using. If you just write the ordered triple (1,0,pi), are you thinking in terms of Cartesian coordinates, cylindrical coordinates, spherical coordinates, or something else?

(My vector calculus book had a nasty habit of always writing things in terms of ordered triples, even when using non-Cartesian bases. It could be a pain.)

That must be pretty annoying, unless they state at the top of page what coordinates they're using or something.

I would always write (a,b,c) meaning cartesians and explicitly write in unit vectors if using any other "strange" coordinate system.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
8K
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K