B Something Fun I Stumbled Across

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Thinkaholic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fun
Thinkaholic
Messages
19
Reaction score
6
Hi! I know all of you might know what I'm about to post, but I just discovered it for myself, and I want to share my enthusiasm.
Let
gif.gif

and
gif.gif
(here, I'll be restricting the domain of f(x) to the positive real numbers.)
Here is a graph of the two, with f(x) in blue and F(x) in black:

upload_2018-5-9_19-1-12.png

1st question: Where does f(x) intersect with the line y=x?

you could write
gif.gif

squaring both sides of the equation, multiplying both sides by x-1, and subtracting x from both sides gives
gif.gif

Factoring x from the LHS and dividing both sides by x leaves you with
gif.gif

This is the minimal polynomial for the golden ratio, or φ, and the minimal polynomial for -φ^-1, or -Φ. This means that the quadratic above has two solutions at φ and -Φ. -Φ cannot be the solution we are looking for, as, as stated above, I am only dealing with f(x) within the domain of the positive real numbers (positive x values only). So, the intersection of f(x) and y=x is at (φ,φ)!

Question 2: What is the value of
gif.gif
?

Using L'Hospital's Rule, we obtain that
gif.gif

calling the limit as x approaches infinity of f(x) "L", then this becomes
gif.gif

and obviously L=1. So
gif.gif
.

Question 3: What is the derivative of f(x) at (φ,φ)?

If we take the derivative of f(x), plug in φ for x, and make sure to remember that φ-1=Φ and that φ^-1=Φ, we simplify:

gif.gif
Question 4 (finale): What is
gif.gif
?
From the fundamental theorem of calculus

gif.gif


So we could rewrite this as:

gif.gif
Hope I made no typos! Sorry if this is too long, but I want to share these interesting facts with y'all. Also, hopefully the type doesn't mess up, I used rendered LaTeX and pasted the images here. Also, the prefix is beginner, as most of the calculus stuff is taught in high school, but I really don't know what this is, so sorry if that is wrong.
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-5-9_19-1-12.png
    upload_2018-5-9_19-1-12.png
    3.4 KB · Views: 473
  • gif.gif
    gif.gif
    560 bytes · Views: 786
  • gif.gif
    gif.gif
    1.2 KB · Views: 673
  • gif.gif
    gif.gif
    423 bytes · Views: 469
  • gif.gif
    gif.gif
    351 bytes · Views: 463
  • gif.gif
    gif.gif
    323 bytes · Views: 463
  • gif.gif
    gif.gif
    467 bytes · Views: 459
  • gif.gif
    gif.gif
    2.6 KB · Views: 455
  • gif.gif
    gif.gif
    248 bytes · Views: 475
  • gif.gif
    gif.gif
    520 bytes · Views: 464
  • gif.gif
    gif.gif
    2.1 KB · Views: 455
  • gif.gif
    gif.gif
    623 bytes · Views: 449
  • gif.gif
    gif.gif
    1.4 KB · Views: 452
  • gif.gif
    gif.gif
    1.2 KB · Views: 459
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Edits: Stupid typos I made. Fixed.
 
When I "restricted the domain of f to the postitve real numbers" instead of differentiating the f(x) I gave at first, I differentiated the square root of x divided by the square root of x-1. That way the domain of the function and its derivative is restricted to the positive real numbers, and that is why you may have obtained a different answer for the derivative because you used the chain rule on the f(x) I gave, which differentiated f(x) with respect to all values of x.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top