Soon to be third year undergrad student looking for advice.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the viability of pursuing a PhD in Physics for a student at UC San Diego who is uncertain about career prospects. Despite a strong academic record with a 4.0 GPA, the consensus among forum members indicates that a Physics PhD may not be a solid career investment, as many graduates struggle to find rewarding positions compared to those who enter the private sector earlier. However, opportunities exist in applied physics, particularly in research that benefits society, such as protein-folding models and astrophysical simulations. The student is encouraged to weigh the risks and benefits of a PhD against potential industry roles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts and theories
  • Familiarity with applied physics and its career applications
  • Knowledge of graduate school requirements for STEM fields
  • Awareness of industry versus academic career paths
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the career outcomes of Physics PhD graduates versus those with industry experience
  • Explore applied physics programs and their specific focus areas
  • Investigate opportunities in engineering fields related to physics
  • Connect with professionals in the field to gain insights on career trajectories
USEFUL FOR

Undergraduate physics students, prospective graduate students, and individuals considering a career in applied physics or research-oriented roles.

Student100
Education Advisor
Messages
1,653
Reaction score
415
Hey all, so I'm kind of confused about what to do in terms of school to actually land a job on the outside doing what I'm interested in doing. I'm currently a plain ole physics b.s. hopeful, no specializations attached. My plan since going back to school has always been to get a phd in physics; however, I'm not entirely sure if that will land me where I want to be.

What I really wanted to do is more in line with using theory and basic research to then apply those to find novel ways to solve problems. Something almost between basic research and engineering. I heard of applied physics PhDs but haven't actually talked to anyone or know someone who has one, or even if they're junk degrees or not.

I'm not really concerned about making money, or having a cushy job. I had those when I worked for the DoD as a technician and quit to finally try to do something more in line with what I want and beneficial to society. I'm most likely locked into the physics bs which is fine, since I could still do a ms in EE or something if it came to that. (From what I understand from the counselors here at uc San Diego) I have a 4.0 GPA which will probably drift down somewhat since I'm about to actually hit the harder stuff, but generally I'm not to concerned about that.

Is a physics phd still the best course of action?

Honestly I hope this question makes sense, and that there is something out there for me. :p
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Student100 said:
My plan since going back to school has always been to get a phd in physics; however, I'm not entirely sure if that will land me where I want to be.
The bad news: I think there's a vague sort-of-consensus on PhysicsForums that a PhD is not a solid career investment. Many physics PhDs do have cool jobs and/or collect large salaries. The question is whether they have better careers than if they had just worked in private industry for 6-7 years. Even if the PhDs do make more, it's a volatile investment with substantial risk of ruin. I know you said money isn't your primary concern - but if your net worth drops far enough below zero, then money becomes your main concern by force.

The good news: if you really want to do something useful for society, there are many opportunities for you in physics! You'll probably have to go through 2 years of hazing - er, I mean classes. But after that, you really can do useful things until you run out of money or your department does. Some of my colleagues work on protein-folding models which might lead to treatments for Alzheimer's disease. Some of them write programs that simulate galaxies colliding. Some of them travel abroad to hunt for neutrinos. I get to read about Very Big Questions like "Is the arrow of time a statistical illusion?" Of course, we mostly sit on our asses in front of computers and grade homework. But the questions are genuinely interesting, and sometimes we even partially answer them.
Student100 said:
What I really wanted to do is more in line with using theory and basic research to then apply those to find novel ways to solve problems. Something almost between basic research and engineering.
More good news: all the PhD candidates I know fit that description. That includes me, and by most measures, I'm the most theoretical / basic-research-oriented student at my department. (We had someone even more math-y and less experimental, but he graduated.)
 
Hey, thanks for the feedback NegativeDept! Your comment was reassuring and enlightening, the PhD idea was to open more doors than would be available otherwise, after further reading there dose seem to be a consensus that a PhD could actually have a completely opposite effect. I'll have to think things through a bit more and make a decision, still have time though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K