Sorry, I am not sure what you are asking. Could you please clarify?

  • Thread starter Thread starter XodoX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relations
XodoX
Messages
195
Reaction score
0
Trying to prepare for an exam...

4)
Let f : A -> B be any function from the set A to the set B. How is the equivalence relation ~f
on A defined?

5. Let f : R -> R, x -> x^2, (Couldn't find the R symbol - real numbers) be the parabola function. What does the partition for the equivalence relation of this function look like?

Does anybody know how I do this? I'm not understanding this at all!
Thank you in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The only one I can think of is x \sim y \iff f(x) = f(y) which is an equivalence on the domain of f.
 
XodoX said:
Trying to prepare for an exam...

4)
Let f : A -> B be any function from the set A to the set B. How is the equivalence relation ~f
on A defined?

5. Let f : R -> R, x -> x^2, (Couldn't find the R symbol - real numbers) be the parabola function. What does the partition for the equivalence relation of this function look like?

Does anybody know how I do this? I'm not understanding this at all!
Thank you in advance

If you're talking about sets, two sets (A,B) are equal if they have the same members. For any two functions; F(A),F(B) are equivalent if the equality A=B still holds. So two functions which impose different orderings on A and B are still equivalent if the two sets still have the same members.
 
Last edited:
pwsnafu said:
The only one I can think of is x \sim y \iff f(x) = f(y) which is an equivalence on the domain of f.

Thank.s No clue. It's a start. I'll try to do it with this one.



SW VandeCarr said:
If you're talking about sets, two sets (A,B) are equal if they have the same members. For any two functions; F(A),F(B) are equivalent if the equality A=B still holds. So two functions which impose different orderings on A and B are still equivalent if the two sets still have the same members.

Do you mean the first question?
 
XodoX said:
Do you mean the first question?

Yes. If two sets are equal, any partition function(s) on one or both set(s) will leave both sets with the same elements. If you're defining new sets, that's a different question. Does A=B? This would satisfy question one but not question two. If A is {2,3,4} and B is {4,9,16} they are not the same. However f(2)=4, f(3)=9, f(4)=16. f(2,3)=(4,9) etc. That is, the function holds for any partition of A onto B. Perhaps that's what they mean. In this case, both sets must have same cardinality so equivalence means a one to one mapping is possible and that it is bijective (an inverse function exists).
 
Last edited:
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...

Similar threads

Back
Top