MHB Sound Intensity & Distance Relationship

AI Thread Summary
Sound intensity decreases with the square of the distance from the source, following the inverse-square law. Given a sound intensity of 20 W/m² at 8 meters, the intensity at 4 meters can be calculated using the formula I(r) = k/r², where k is a constant. The constant k is determined to be 1280, leading to an intensity of 80 W/m² at 4 meters. This demonstrates that halving the distance from the sound source results in a fourfold increase in intensity. Understanding this relationship is crucial for applications in acoustics and sound engineering.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
4. Sound intensity is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source
The further from the source you are, the less intense the sound.
Suppose the sound intensity is 20 watts per square meter. (W/m^2) at 8 meters.
What is the sound intensity at 4 meters?

$y=\frac{k}{x}$ So. $s=\frac{k}{{d}^{2}}$

$8=\frac{k}{20}$ then $k=160$

$s=\frac{160}{{4}^{2}}=10 W/m^2$

I wasn't sure how this was all pluged in?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Let the intensity $I$ be measured in units of $$\frac{\text{W}}{\text{m}^2}$$, where we are given the inverse-square law of radiation (which works with any kind of energy propagated in 3-space, at least for classical mechanics):

$$I(r)=\frac{k}{r^2}$$

where $k$ is a constant of proportionality, and $r$ is the distance from the source. We are given:

$$I(8)=20=\frac{k}{8^2}\implies k=1280$$

And so we have:

$$I(r)=\frac{1280}{r^2}$$

Thus:

$$I(4)=\frac{1280}{4^2}=80$$

We should expect that if we divide our distance from the source by some factor $0<a$, then the intensity will change by a factor of $a^2$, since:

$$\frac{\dfrac{k}{\left(\dfrac{r}{a}\right)^2}}{\dfrac{k}{r^2}}=a^2$$
 
I should have seen that..
Mahalo
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top