Sound Wave Energy loss question

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the effectiveness of different thicknesses of aluminum discs in transferring sound from a piezoelectric sound transducer to a glass tube filled with water. Participants explore the impact of material properties and sound propagation characteristics on energy loss in sound waves.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the optimal thickness of aluminum discs for sound transfer, noting the project involves a piezoelectric transducer and a glass tube filled with water.
  • Another participant requests additional details about the geometry and frequency of sound waves, suggesting that the coupling between materials depends on the wavelength relative to the dimensions of the materials.
  • A participant provides specific dimensions of the glass tube and mentions a desired frequency range of 20-60 kHz, with a focus on 40 kHz.
  • One participant notes the speed of sound in aluminum varies by alloy, suggesting that a lower speed (around 3100 m/s) may be preferable for matching with water's sound speed of 1484 m/s.
  • It is proposed that the thinner aluminum disc may minimize losses, as the wavelength at 40 kHz is significantly larger than the thickness of the aluminum.
  • A later reply questions the speed of sound mentioned, suggesting it may refer to the speed of transverse waves in aluminum.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the optimal aluminum thickness and the relevance of material properties, with no consensus reached on the best approach for minimizing energy loss in sound transfer.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of material properties, geometry, and sound speed in their discussion, but specific assumptions and definitions regarding the materials and their interactions remain unresolved.

nst.john
Messages
163
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone!

I am currently working on a project where I have a piezoelectric sound transducer connected to a glass tube via an aluminum disc. I got two aluminum discs with one twice the thickness as the other. I wanted to know which aluminum disc would work best, the thin one or the thick one, to transfer sound from the transducer to the tube. The tube will be filled with water as well if that makes any difference. Thank you for your help and hope to hear from somebody soon!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It would help to know more about the geometry and desired frequency. Which medium the sound waves are to propagate in the glass or the water? In general the coupling between materials will depend on the change in wavelength between the two materials. If the wavelength in a material is long compared to the dimensions or small? Even with all this I would still have to lookup the reflection coefficient as a function frequency and so forth.
 
The geometry of the glass is an outside diameter of 100mm, wall thickness of 5mm and a length of 415mm. The desired frequency is 40kHz approximately but we will be working in a range between 20-60kHz. The sound waves are to propagate in the water.
 
Great, a quick Google gives the range of sound speed in aluminum as 3100 to 6400 m/s. I assume that this is dependent on the alloy selected. The sound speed in water is 1484 m/s. As a general rule of thumb is to match as closely as possible the speed of sound in the two medium. I would select an aluminum closer to 3100 m/s. I would also neglect the tube for now. At 40kH the wavelength is 8ish cm. This is much larger than the aluminum thickness. So I would go with the thinner of the two to minimize losses which I'm guessing are small in aluminum.
 
Thank you very much for all of your help. That answer helps with everything!
 
The 3100 m/s is probably the speed of the transverse waves in aluminum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K