Sound waves - Detector and a moving wall

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
21 replies · 5K views
Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93

Homework Statement


A sound source, detector and a movable wall are arranged as shown in the figure. In this arrangement detector is detecting the maximum intensity. If the speed of sound is 330 m/s in air and frequency of source is 600 Hz, then find the distance by which the wall should be moved away from the source, so that detector detects minimum intensity.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't quite understand the situation. Do the waves reflected by the wall ever reach the detector? I don't see how the reflected waves would reach the detector. (Can I assume that the waves get reflected the same way as a light ray would? )

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • wall and detector.png
    wall and detector.png
    4 KB · Views: 849
Physics news on Phys.org
ehild said:
Have you experienced echo in your life? All waves can reflect...

ehild

Yes, I have experienced it but for that the reflected waves should reach the detector. But here they don't.
 
ehild said:
Why not? The reflected wave travels backwards.

ehild

So the sound waves don't reflect as the light rays would? :confused:
 
ehild said:
They reflect the same way, but here the incidence is normal. That sound source can be a loudspeaker, not a "point source"

Okay but how should I begin making the equations?
 
ehild said:
Think. How can the sound arrive by two different ways to the detector?

ehild

By reflection and directly from the source.
 
ehild said:
And what is the path difference?

For constructive interference or maximum intensity, it is ##n\lambda## and for destructive interference or minimum intensity it is ##\displaystyle \left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right)\lambda## but I still have no idea what am I supposed to do with this. :confused:
 
What is the geometric path difference between the reflected wave and the directly arriving wave at the detector? And consider the phase change at the wall, too.


ehild
 

Attachments

  • soundref.JPG
    soundref.JPG
    14.9 KB · Views: 674
ehild said:
What is the geometric path difference between the reflected wave and the directly arriving wave at the detector? And consider the phase change at the wall, too. ehild

There will be a phase change of ##\pi## which corresponds to a path difference of ##\frac{\lambda}{2}##.
[tex]\Delta p=\left(d+x+\frac{\lambda}{2}\right)-(d-x)[/tex]
[tex]\Delta p=2x+\frac{\lambda}{2}[/tex]
Is this correct?
 
ehild said:
What is the geometric path difference between the reflected wave and the directly arriving wave at the detector? And consider the phase change at the wall, too.


ehild

Will there be a phase change at the wall? It's of higher acoustic impedance than the air.
 
Curious3141 said:
Will there be a phase change at the wall? It's of higher acoustic impedance than the air.

I just checked my notes. It says that there will be no phase change when the wave is reflected from the rigid boundary.

Should I make the equations again?
 
Pranav-Arora said:
I just checked my notes. It says that there will be no phase change when the wave is reflected from the rigid boundary.

Should I make the equations again?

Of course, if there's a change in your assumptions, there'll be a change in your equations. :smile:
 
Pranav-Arora said:
I just checked my notes. It says that there will be no phase change when the wave is reflected from the rigid boundary.

Should I make the equations again?

Yes. Omit the Lambda/2.
 
Curious3141 said:
Of course, if there's a change in your assumptions, there'll be a change in your equations. :smile:

Since there is no phase change, for maximum intensity,
[tex]2x=n\lambda[/tex]
For destructive interference
[tex]2x'=\left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right)\lambda[/tex]
Change in distance between the detector and wall
[tex]\Delta x=x'-x=\frac{\lambda}{4}[/tex]
[tex]\Delta x=0.125 m[/tex]

Thanks a lot both of you, this is the right answer. :smile:
 
Pranav-Arora said:
Since there is no phase change, for maximum intensity,
[tex]2x=n\lambda[/tex]
For destructive interference
[tex]2x'=\left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right)\lambda[/tex]
Change in distance between the detector and wall
[tex]\Delta x=x'-x=\frac{\lambda}{4}[/tex]
[tex]\Delta x=0.125 m[/tex]

Thanks a lot both of you, this is the right answer. :smile:

Isn't ##\displaystyle \frac{\lambda}{4} = 0.1375m##? :confused:

##\displaystyle \lambda = \frac{v}{f} = \frac{330ms^{-1}}{600s^{-1}} = 0.55m##
 
Curious3141 said:
Isn't ##\displaystyle \frac{\lambda}{4} = 0.1375m##? :confused:

##\displaystyle \lambda = \frac{v}{f} = \frac{330ms^{-1}}{600s^{-1}} = 0.55m##

Sorry about that, its 660 Hz in the question. That's a typo in the main post. :)