Source terms in Maxwell's Equations and retarded positions

  • Thread starter Smacal1072
  • Start date
  • #1
59
0
Hi All,

Thanks again to all the great mentors and contributors to this forum.

I wanted to ask a question about the Gauss's law/Ampere's law equations in Maxwell's Equations:

[itex]

\nabla \bullet \textbf{E} = \frac{\rho}{\epsilon_0}
\\
\\
\nabla \times \textbf{B} = \mu \left( \textbf{J} + \epsilon \frac{\partial\textbf{E}}{\partial t} \right)
[/itex]

For charge distributions or currents that are accelerating, I was taught that you need to consider the retarded potentials in order to derive the fields. Why are Maxwell's Equations not written like this:

[itex]

\nabla \bullet \textbf{E} = \frac{\rho_r}{\epsilon_0}
\\
\\
\nabla \times \textbf{B} = \mu \left( \textbf{J}_r + \epsilon \frac{\partial\textbf{E}}{\partial t} \right)
[/itex]

Where [itex]\textbf{J}_r \mbox{ and } \rho_r [/itex] are the retarded charge and retarded current density?

Edit: In retrospect, I should have used the integral version of the equations, in particular:

[itex]
\oint \textbf{B} \bullet dl = \mu_0 \iint \left( \textbf{J} + \epsilon_0 \frac{\partial \textbf{E}}{\partial t} \right) \bullet d\textbf{S}
[/itex]

For example, if we instantly switch on a current element at the origin at t = 0, then calculate [itex]\oint \textbf{B} \bullet dl[/itex] at a radius of a million miles, we'll get zero, even though at that instant, a current may be flowing. Unless the current density and "displacement current" cancel out, the inequality won't hold...
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
1,233
18
There are some catches here. The differential forms don't have retarded potentials because they are, by definition, locally defined.

And as soon as you turn the current on, what makes you think dE/dt is zero? increasing J creates an increasing rot(B) which creates an increasing rot(E), and dE/dt should be in the opposite direction of the original increase in current. I'm not sure how these actually manifest in the retarded potential, but my lazy guess is that J and e0*dE/dt will cancel until the resulting EM radiation reaches your loop integral.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person

Related Threads on Source terms in Maxwell's Equations and retarded positions

Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
830
  • Last Post
2
Replies
47
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • Last Post
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
672
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
416
Top