Sources of Error in Youngs double slit experiment

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on identifying sources of error in Young's double slit experiment using a laser pointer as the light source. Key errors include systematic and statistical errors, which arise from measurement inaccuracies and methodological flaws. The equations dsin(Θ) = mλ and dsin(Θ) = (m + 1/2)λ are critical in analyzing the results, particularly in relation to the spacing of the slits and the wavelength of the laser. Understanding these errors is essential for accurately interpreting experimental outcomes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Young's double slit experiment
  • Familiarity with systematic and statistical errors
  • Knowledge of the equations dsin(Θ) = mλ and dsin(Θ) = (m + 1/2)λ
  • Basic principles of laser optics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods to minimize systematic errors in optical experiments
  • Learn about statistical error analysis techniques
  • Explore the impact of slit spacing on interference patterns
  • Investigate the effects of laser wavelength on experimental results
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on optics and experimental design, as well as researchers analyzing interference phenomena.

danepaj
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
we used a laser pointer as a light source

Homework Equations


I'm having trouble looking for an error in the experiment.

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
Well... what kinds of error are there?
What sort of thing gives rise to each kind?
 
my teacher doesn't accept any human error so it should all be systematic I guess
 
There are systematic and statistical errors - besides downright mistakes, which your teacher is calling "human error".
Ignoring mistakes ... systematic and statistical errors come in every time you measure something, or use a value that someone else has measured.
So list everything you have measured and pay attention to how you measured it.
How inaccurate was the measurement (statistical error), and was there anything about the method that could have given a consistently high r low reading (systematic error)?
 
Consider a possible purpose of experimentation: to understand a seemingly cold and detached equation; you are understanding how the experiment yielded the equation: conversely, how might a variance between equation and experiment signify you have made a mistake?

From this perspective, notice how the variables in your equations:

dsin(Θ) = mλ
dsin(Θ)= (m + 1/2)λ

May have influenced your results; for example: was the order of interference you observed counter to what it should have been? (m as dependent upon the ratio of the product of distance between slits and the color of laser used). In this scenario, one error could have been that you spaced the slits too far apart, so d was too great.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K