Sources of Error in Youngs double slit experiment

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying sources of error in Young's double slit experiment, specifically focusing on systematic errors as the original poster's teacher does not accept human error. The subject area pertains to experimental physics and measurement accuracy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the types of errors that can occur in experiments, distinguishing between systematic and statistical errors. Questions are raised about the nature of measurements and how they might contribute to inaccuracies.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring various types of errors and their implications on the experiment's outcomes. Some guidance has been offered regarding the importance of measurement methods and the potential impact of experimental setup on results.

Contextual Notes

The original poster is constrained by the teacher's stipulation that human error is not to be considered, which may limit the scope of the discussion regarding potential inaccuracies.

danepaj
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
we used a laser pointer as a light source

Homework Equations


I'm having trouble looking for an error in the experiment.

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF;
Well... what kinds of error are there?
What sort of thing gives rise to each kind?
 
my teacher doesn't accept any human error so it should all be systematic I guess
 
There are systematic and statistical errors - besides downright mistakes, which your teacher is calling "human error".
Ignoring mistakes ... systematic and statistical errors come in every time you measure something, or use a value that someone else has measured.
So list everything you have measured and pay attention to how you measured it.
How inaccurate was the measurement (statistical error), and was there anything about the method that could have given a consistently high r low reading (systematic error)?
 
Consider a possible purpose of experimentation: to understand a seemingly cold and detached equation; you are understanding how the experiment yielded the equation: conversely, how might a variance between equation and experiment signify you have made a mistake?

From this perspective, notice how the variables in your equations:

dsin(Θ) = mλ
dsin(Θ)= (m + 1/2)λ

May have influenced your results; for example: was the order of interference you observed counter to what it should have been? (m as dependent upon the ratio of the product of distance between slits and the color of laser used). In this scenario, one error could have been that you spaced the slits too far apart, so d was too great.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K