Space discussion not welcome here.

  • Thread starter Thread starter spacester
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Complaints about thread content are valid but must adhere to forum guidelines. The mentors determined that the thread in question violated rules against overly speculative posts. It primarily consisted of idle speculation rather than substantive science or engineering discussion. As a result, the mentors believe it should have been locked earlier. Engaging in meaningful, evidence-based dialogue is encouraged in this forum.
spacester
Messages
61
Reaction score
2
Is this the proper forum to make a complaint?

Or are complaints against the rules?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The mentors have decided that the thread was in violation of the PF guidelines on overly speculative posts and should have been locked a long time ago.
 
To be more specific, it was mostly just free-form idle speculation without much real science/engineering content.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...
Back
Top