Space-intervals, proper time, and proper distance

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concepts of proper distance and proper time in the context of special relativity, exploring their definitions, calculations, and implications for different scenarios involving spacetime intervals. Participants engage with both theoretical and conceptual aspects of these terms, as well as their application to specific examples.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asks for clarification on the definition of proper distance, specifically in relation to two observers moving at different velocities (V = 0.6c).
  • Another participant explains that proper distance is defined as the length of an object as measured by an observer at rest relative to it, and notes that proper time is associated with timelike intervals while proper distance is associated with spacelike intervals.
  • A participant expresses confusion about whether timelike events can have proper distance, questioning the implications of boosting the graph to analyze distances between events.
  • Several participants discuss the mathematical expressions for proper time and proper distance, with some proposing that proper distance can be calculated using the square root of the difference between spatial and temporal intervals, while others challenge this notion.
  • One participant suggests that if the square root of the time interval squared minus the space interval squared is real, then the reverse must be imaginary, implying that timelike intervals cannot have proper distance.
  • Another participant agrees with the conclusion that if one expression is real, the other must be imaginary, reinforcing the distinction between timelike and spacelike intervals.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between proper distance and proper time, with some asserting that timelike intervals cannot possess proper distance, while others explore the implications of specific scenarios without reaching a consensus. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the calculations and interpretations of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the mathematical expressions for spacetime intervals, but there are unresolved assumptions regarding the conditions under which proper distance and proper time can be calculated. The discussion also highlights the need for clarity in definitions and the implications of different observer frames.

Stephanus
Messages
1,316
Reaction score
104
Can I ask a question here?
What is proper distance?
ProperTime.jpg

V = 0.6c

What is proper distance for Blue?
What is proper distance for Green?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We can always calculate the square of the spacetime interval between two events using ##\Delta{s}^2=\Delta{t}^2-\Delta{x}^2##.

If ##\Delta{s}^2## is greater that zero, we call ##\Delta{s}## the "proper time" along the interval and say that the interval is "timelike". If it is less than zero, we call ##\sqrt{-\Delta{s}^2}## the "proper distance" along the interval and say that the interval is "spacelike".

In your example, both the blue and the green lines are timelike, so they have a proper time (five for the blue one, four for the green one) but no proper distance. The red line is spacelike and the proper distance along it is three.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bcrowell
Physically, proper distance is the length of an object as measured by an observer who is at rest relative to the object. The "object" doesn't actually have to be a physical object. If you have two events in spacetime, you can call them the ends of the "object," and then being at rest relative to the "object" means having a state of motion such that the two events are simultaneous.
 
Dear PF Forum,
I'm learning SR as a hobby.
And in these past 3 months, I have aquainted with some SR terms such as:
Proper time, world line, time like, space time diagram, light cone, event. Doppler effect, we were introduced in high school. And I find it important for me not to miss a single word, so that I can understand the post.
Here, I want to know about "Proper distance" (Btw, it took me 1 week to understand "Proper Time", it's the knot on the world line)
Nugatory said:
We can always calculate the square of the spacetime interval between two events using ##\Delta{s}^2=\Delta{t}^2-\Delta{x}^2##.
Okay, if I'm not mistaken, we use this to calculate proper time.
Nugatory said:
If ##\Delta{s}^2## is greater that zero, we call ##\Delta{s}## the "proper time" along the interval and say that the interval is "timelike". If it is less than zero, we call ##\sqrt{-\Delta{s}^2}## the "proper distance" along the interval and say that the interval is "spacelike".
Yes, I understand this.
Nugatory said:
In your example, both the blue and the green lines are timelike
Are you trying to say that they don't have "proper distance"? I can understand it, if we look at the picture that I upload, We can boost the graph according to V, so that Red WL is at rest.
"How can a rest observer have distance?" It makes sense.
But supposed, the left world line is at London and the right world line is at Paris. Isn't the distance between London and Paris 200 miles?
Nugatory said:
The red line is spacelike and the proper distance along it is three.
bcrowell said:
Physically, proper distance is the length of an object as measured by an observer who is at rest relative to the object. The "object" doesn't actually have to be a physical object. If you have two events in spacetime, you can call them the ends of the "object," and then being at rest relative to the "object" means having a state of motion such that the two events are simultaneous.
Here I presented the graph:
ST-01.jpg

To calculate "proper time" we have to boost the picture at -V.
But I think we can calculate it using ##\sqrt{\Delta t^2 - \Delta x^2} \text{ or } \sqrt{\Delta t^2 - (\Delta tv)^2}##
And to calculate "Proper distance" do we have to boost the picture at imaginary V?
Here for event S, the supposed V is 1.667c.
So, when I boost it at 1.667c, we have picture 2. S and E0 is simultanous and we can calculate the "Proper distance"
So, here my questions:
1. Does time like events have "proper distance"?
2. Because if we boost it at -V, the distance is 0 (see Pic 2 Red WL), but London and Paris is still 200 miles, isn't it?
3. To calculate "proper distance" ##Proper Distance = \sqrt{\Delta x^2 - \Delta t^2}##? Or to boost it, so it's simultaneous?
Thanks for any confirmation.
 
Add:
An after tought
A: If ##\sqrt{t^2 - x^2}## is real, then there is no ##\sqrt{x^2 - t^2}##. Time like cannot have proper distance.
B: If ##\sqrt{x^2 - t^2}## is real, then ##\sqrt{t^2 - x^2}## is imaginary. Space like cannot have proper time.
Is this the simple conclusion?
 
Stephanus said:
Add:
An after tought
A: If ##\sqrt{t^2 - x^2}## is real, then there is no ##\sqrt{x^2 - t^2}##. Time like cannot have proper distance.
B: If ##\sqrt{x^2 - t^2}## is real, then ##\sqrt{t^2 - x^2}## is imaginary. Space like cannot have proper time.
Is this the simple conclusion?

Pretty much yes (although it is a good practice to write these expressions as ##\Delta{t}^2-\Delta{x}^2## and ##\Delta{x}^2-\Delta{t}^2## instead - that makes it clear that we're working with the difference between two coordinate values, not the values of coordinates).

The other important thing to bear in mind is that ##\sqrt{\Delta{t}^2-\Delta{x}^2}## and ##\sqrt{\Delta{x}^2-\Delta{t}^2}## will always have the same value in all inertial frames, even though the values of ##\Delta{t}## and ##\Delta{x}## may be very different (You can see this by doing some algebra with the Lorentz transformations). It is because of this that they have physical significance.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mentz114 and Stephanus

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
943
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K