Space-Time Invariance, Weird Names and Some Questions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of spacetime intervals in the context of special relativity, specifically addressing the terminology of "timelike" and "spacelike" intervals. Participants explore the implications of these terms and their meanings in relation to causality and the nature of events in spacetime.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the naming conventions of "timelike" and "spacelike," suggesting that the definitions seem counterintuitive based on their descriptions of events occurring at the same time or position.
  • Another participant explains that "timelike" and "spacelike" refer to the intervals or directions between events, clarifying that events occurring at the same time relate to space, while events at the same position relate to time.
  • A participant confirms that "causal" refers to one event causing another, noting that spacelike intervals imply that influence between events is impossible.
  • Further clarification is provided regarding the concept of timelike trajectories and their relation to an object's region of influence in spacetime, described using the analogy of a light cone.
  • Another participant emphasizes the proper term "spacetime interval," which is invariant and categorizes intervals as timelike, spacelike, or light-like based on measurement capabilities with inertial clocks or rulers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the terminology used for spacetime intervals, indicating a lack of consensus on the naming conventions. However, there is agreement on the definitions of causal relationships and the nature of spacetime intervals.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the definitions of timelike and spacelike intervals may not be fully articulated, and the discussion does not resolve the initial participant's confusion regarding the naming conventions.

RadiantL
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Hi, so I was going over my lectures notes and I was looking at the Invariance, S2 for space time.

I was just wondering why they call it time-like for S2<0 and space-like for S2>0 because,

S2>0 says that there is an inertial frame where events occur at the same time (this has to do with time, why call it space like?)

and

S2<0 says that there is an inertial frame where events occur at the same position
(this has to do with space, why call it time like?)

So yeah, why the weird naming?

Also I was wondering, according to my notes it says when events are time like they can be connected by a signal slower then light, and could be causal.

So can there be events where they can be connected by a signal and not be causal? ... And in S.R, when books say causal, they mean an event causes another right?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Timelike and spacelike refer to the intervals or directions. If two events happen at the same time, then all the stuff between them is only space. If two events happen at the same position, then the only stuff between them is time.

Yes, causal means that an event causes another. Sometimes we expand the word a bit to say that one event could influence another (as opposed to that influence being impossible, as it is if two events are spacelike separated).

This should also help you understand timelike intervals. An object that follows a timelike trajectory or goes along an interval is basically going forward in time like you'd expect most things would, so any point in spacetime that object can reach by timelike trajectories is within its region of influence--a region that extends forward in time and through space. This region is called a light cone because in some diagrams, people put the x and y axes in a plane and the t axis perpendicular, and the region takes on a cone shape. Lightlike trajectories define the boundary of the cone, and everything between them is a possible path for most ordinary objects.
 
The proper term is "spacetime interval" which is an invariant (does not depend on the reference frame) for the interval between two events. If it is time-like, that means that you could measure the interval with an inertial clock present at the two events. If it is space-like, that means that you could measure the interval with an inertial ruler that is present at the two events. If it is light-like, that means you cannot measure the interval. The interval between any two events falls into one of those three types.
 
Thanks Murphid and ghwellsjr, really cleared things up :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 144 ·
5
Replies
144
Views
12K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
946
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 101 ·
4
Replies
101
Views
7K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K