Spaceship travels at .83 c, relativity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a relativistic scenario involving a spaceship traveling at 0.83 times the speed of light (c) towards the star Tau Ceti, while observing the explosions of both the Sun and Tau Ceti. The focus is on understanding the time dilation effects and the application of Lorentz transformations to determine the time differences in the spaceship's frame of reference.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the application of Lorentz transformations to calculate the time elapsed in different frames of reference. Questions arise regarding the validity of subtracting time measurements from different frames and the interpretation of the problem statement.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on the correct interpretation of the problem, emphasizing that both time measurements should be made in the spaceship's frame. There is an ongoing exploration of the Lorentz transformation equations and their implications for the observed events.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the calculations and the implications of relativity on the observed times of the explosions. There is mention of specific values and transformations used, but no consensus on the correctness of the answers has been reached.

harts
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Suppose our sun is about to explode and we escape in a spaceship toward the star Tau Ceti. When we reach the midpoint of our journey, which takes place at v=.83 C we see our sun explode and, unfortunately, we see Tau Ceti explode as well (we observe the light arriving from each explosion. (there's a part a and b but i understand those parts, so i'll go straight to c and d)

c)In the spaceship frame of reference, how long before we saw the Sun explode did it actually explode? (enter a positive value for times in the past.)

d) In the spaceship frame of reference, how long before we saw Tau Ceta explode did it actually explode?

Homework Equations



Δt = [itex]\gamma[/itex](Δt' - v/c2Δx') } S'-->S

The Attempt at a Solution



c) I have worked out an answer using the equation I gave but I'm not sure if its correct.
I said that S is my frame for the spaceship and S' is my frame for the sun.
Δt = [itex]\gamma[/itex](Δt' - v/c2Δx')
so Δt = 1/(sqrt(1-(.83c)2/c2))*((6 years)+(.83c*6c)/c2)
Δt=19.686 years
Δt' = 6 years
So it actually exploded 13.686 years ago?

for part d), i used the same equation but instead used -v
so Δt = 1/(sqrt√(1-(-.83c)2/c2))*((6 years)+(-.83c*6c)/c2)
= 1.823 years
so it actually happened 1.823-6 = -4.171
4 years into the future? This is the main reason why I'm not believing my answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi harts! welcome to pf! :smile:
harts said:
Δt=19.686 years
Δt' = 6 years
So it actually exploded 13.686 years ago?

how can you subtract measurements in two different frames? :confused:

(and what do you think "∆" means? :wink:)
 
Thanks for the reply!
OK, I thought I was finding the difference in time between the two frames, which is why I subtracted the change in time from one frame from the change in time in the other frame. Am I misinterpreting the question?

"In the spaceship frame of reference, how long before we saw the Sun explode did it actually explode?"
 
hi harts! :smile:

(just got up :zzz:)
harts said:
Am I misinterpreting the question?

"In the spaceship frame of reference, how long before we saw the Sun explode did it actually explode?"

yup! …

both measurements must be made in the spaceship frame …

the time the sun exploded, and the time the light reached the spaceship :wink:
 
OK I think I understand it now. I know that the sun actually exploded 6 years ago, but because of relativity I have to use a lorentz transformation to figure out how much time it took for us to see it.

For part c, I use my equation

t'= ((-6 years)-(.83c/c^2)(-6ly))/ sqrt(1-(.83c)^2/c^2)= -1.83

For part d, I use the same equation but use 6 light years for my x value and I got -19.686 years.

I guess it just took me a while to understand those lorentz transformation equations. Thanks tiny tim
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
12K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K