Spacetime interval question involving a Pendulum in a Space Ship

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a thought experiment involving a pendulum inside a spaceship traveling at a significant fraction of the speed of light. Participants explore the implications of special relativity on the period of the pendulum as observed from different frames of reference, particularly focusing on the spacetime interval and time dilation effects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the spacetime interval for events related to the pendulum and finds an inconsistency when comparing the period of the pendulum in the spaceship frame to that in the Earth frame.
  • Another participant asserts that a pendulum cannot function in a spaceship due to the lack of gravity, prompting a discussion on the nature of pendulums and oscillators.
  • Concerns are raised about the correct application of the spacetime interval and transformations between inertial frames, with one participant suggesting that the original poster has not grasped these concepts despite previous discussions.
  • There is a debate about whether a pendulum can be constructed using springs, with some participants distinguishing between pendulums and simple harmonic oscillators.
  • References are made to torsion pendulum clocks, which some participants acknowledge as a valid form of pendulum that could operate under different conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the feasibility of a pendulum in a spaceship and the correct application of relativistic transformations. There is no consensus on the original poster's calculations or the nature of the pendulum in this context.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in the original poster's understanding of frame transformations and the implications of special relativity, which may affect the validity of their calculations.

Chenkel
Messages
482
Reaction score
109
Hello everyone, I was working on a thought experiment and came upon an inconsistent result that I thought maybe I could get some help with.

Firstly I am using natural units (c = unitless 1 i.e 1 light second per second) and I chose v = 3/5 to make gamma come out nicely (gamma equals 5/4 when v equals 3/5)

So the spaceship traveling at 3/5 light seconds per second has a pendulum at rest inside it with a period of 1 hertz (1 cycle per second) so I calculated the spacetime interval to be the squared distance between events minus the squared distance light travels between the events occurring, so that means the spacetime interval is equal to 0 - 1 = -1 light seconds.

In one second the spaceship travels 3/5 light seconds so relative to earth there is now a distance between the event of the pendulum coming back to its initial position of 3/5 light seconds.

So to discover the period of the pendulum relative to earth I solve the equation ##-1 = (\frac 3 5)^2 - (\Delta t)^2## So that means ##(\Delta t)^2 = \frac {9} {25} + \frac {25} {25} = \frac {34}{25}## so I have ##\Delta t = \sqrt {\frac {34} {25}}= 1.16##

So if the period of the pendulum in the spaceship is 1 second then the period of the pendulum that's on the spaceship relative to earth would be 1.16 seconds using my spacetime interval equations.

If I take the period of the pendulum on the spaceship (1 second) and multiply by gamma I should get the period of the pendulum on the spaceship relative to someone on earth which should be gamma, but gamma equals 1.25 using the time dilation formula, so these results seem inconsistent.

Any help would be appreciated, thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale
Physics news on Phys.org
A pendulum won't work on a spaceship! It relies on gravity.
 
In the Earth frame, ##\Delta x## is not ##v\times 1##, it's ##v\Delta t##.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: Chenkel and Sagittarius A-Star
PeroK said:
A pendulum won't work on a spaceship! It relies on gravity.
Can't a pendulum be made with springs?
 
Chenkel said:
Can't a pendulum be made with springs?
A simple harmonic oscillator can be made with springs, but I don't think anyone would call it a "pendulum". "Pendulum" is a special case of "simple harmonic oscillator", not the other way around.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chenkel
Chenkel said:
I was working on a thought experiment
Which looks just like all the other thought experiments you have already posted multiple threads on. Your basic issue in every single one has been the same: you still haven't grasped how to correctly transform between inertial frames. Your question here has nothing specifically to do with pendulums or springs or oscillators, and could be posed just as easily with light clocks--if you hadn't already posted a thread on light clocks.

Enough is enough. It is pointless to keep repeating the same explanations that you have already been given multilple times in multiple prior threads. If it didn't work with you then, it's not going to work with you now. You will have to somehow figure this out on your own. We have done all that we can to help you.

Thread closed.
 
PeterDonis said:
A simple harmonic oscillator can be made with springs, but I don't think anyone would call it a "pendulum". "Pendulum" is a special case of "simple harmonic oscillator", not the other way around.
There are torsion pendulum clocks

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torsion_pendulum_clock
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
Dale said:
There are torsion pendulum clocks
Hm, yes, I wasn't thinking of a torsion spring, but it does qualify as a spring. :oops:

However, the basic point I made in post #6 remains the same.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 141 ·
5
Replies
141
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 123 ·
5
Replies
123
Views
8K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K