SR Thought: Spacetime Interval w/ Bounds of ##0<\alpha<1##

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter benorin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spacetime interval Sr
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the spacetime interval in the context of special relativity, specifically examining the relationship between time intervals in different frames of reference, denoted by the variable ##\alpha##, which is constrained between 0 and 1. Participants explore the implications of this relationship and the conditions under which it holds, as well as the definitions of events in spacetime.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a relationship between time intervals in the lab and rocket frames, suggesting that ##\alpha \Delta t_L = \Delta t_R##, and expresses uncertainty about a potential error in their reasoning.
  • Another participant questions the specification of events necessary for calculating the spacetime interval, emphasizing the importance of defining coordinates for two distinct events in spacetime.
  • A third participant notes that the value of ##\alpha## can vary depending on the choice of events, suggesting that it may represent a time dilation factor related to the Lorentz transformation.
  • A subsequent reply confirms the initial assumption about ##\alpha## being related to time dilation and discusses the implications for the spatial displacement in the rocket frame when ##\Delta x_R=0##.
  • Another participant suggests that using units where ##c=1## simplifies the calculations and clarifies the relationship of ##\alpha## to the Lorentz factor.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to specify events for proper calculation of the spacetime interval, but there is no consensus on the implications of the variable ##\alpha## or the correct interpretation of the relationships being discussed. Multiple competing views remain regarding the definitions and calculations involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the definitions of events and the assumptions underlying the calculations, particularly regarding the relationship between velocity, time intervals, and the spacetime interval. There are unresolved questions about the correct bounds for ##\alpha## and its interpretation in the context of Lorentz transformations.

benorin
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,442
Reaction score
191
TL;DR
Just a note, wonder where the rabbit hole leads
Suppose the time interval in the Lab frame is a multiple of the time interval in the Rocket frame ##\alpha \Delta t_L = \Delta t_R##, where ##0 < \alpha < 1## without loss of generality. Then the spacetime interval is

##\left( \Delta t_L\right) ^2-\left( \Delta x_L\right) ^2 = \left( \Delta t_R\right) ^2-\left( \Delta x_R\right) ^2\Rightarrow \left( \Delta t_L\right) ^2=\frac{\left( \Delta x_L\right) ^2 -\left( \Delta x_R\right) ^2}{1-\alpha^2}##

The thought ended abruptly there. I guess I just wanted to jot this down before I forgot, and hey, if you've got some good idea how to proceed from here: post it! Thanks!

Edit: something is off, like a minor error... but I can't put my finger on it. Should the bounds for be ##1< \alpha < \infty##?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The spacetime interval between which pair of events? You haven’t specified that, and until you do there’s no way of checking your calculation.

Remember that an event is a point in spacetime, not time. “The moment when the lab clock reads ##T## and the rocket clock reads ##T/\gamma##” is not an event. “The lab clock at this point in space reads ##T##” is an event. “The rocket clock at that point in space reads ##T/\gamma##” is a different event even if it happens at the same time.

So the first step is for you to write down the ##x## and ##t## coordinates of two events. You can use either the lab frame or the rocket frame to assign these coordinates, as long as you’re consistent and only use one frame or the other.

Once you’ve done that and you can calculate the spacetime interval between the two events, use the Lorentz transformations to find the coordinates of the two events in the other frame, and then check that you get the same interval using those coordinates.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Orodruin
As Nugatory says, this depends on the pair of events you are considering. You can make ##\alpha## anything between ##\pm\infty## depending on that choice.

I would guess that you are thinking of ##\alpha## as the time dilation factor, which would imply ##\alpha=\sqrt{1-v^2}## (i.e. your ##\alpha## is the reciprocal of Lorentz' ##\gamma##). If I've guessed correctly, then for your initial equation to hold you need ##\Delta x_R=0##. In that case your final result can be rearranged to read ##(\Delta x_L)^2=(v\Delta t_L)^2##, a restatement of the fact that the rocket moves at ##v## in the lab frame.
 
Last edited:
I was indeed as you suspected Ibix thinking along the lines of a rocket going with constant velocity through the Lab frame so that ##\Delta x_R =0 \Rightarrow \alpha = \sqrt{1-\left( \frac{\Delta x_L}{\Delta t_L}\right) ^2}## is what I derive from the OP. Now my question is doesn't ##\frac{\Delta x_L}{\Delta t_L}:=v##? But then I also worked out the moving light-clock problem and suspect this should rather be ##\frac{v}{c}## to give the the expected Lorentz equation (or time dilation equation, whatever?). What am I missing?
 
It's usually easier to work in units where ##c=1##, since then you can drop factors of ##c## that pop up all over the place. I did that without commenting - apologies. Your ##\alpha## is ##\sqrt{1-v^2/c^2}## if you don't work in such units, yes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 123 ·
5
Replies
123
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 146 ·
5
Replies
146
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K